1997SCMR1281 (PLP)
LIAQAT ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1997SCMR1281 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ |
| Parties | LIAQAT ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997SCMR1281 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997SCMR1281 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza, Irshad Hasan Khan and Raja Afrasiab Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1997SCMR1281 (PLP) (LIAQAT ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Muhammad Najmuz‑Zaman, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 4th April, 1997.
- Ch. Muhammad Ibrahim, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 25‑8‑1996 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore in Cr.M. 4/96 and Criminal Appeal No. 592/94). ‑‑‑‑S. 497(5)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Cancellation of bail‑‑‑Petitioner had sought cancellation of bail granted to accused by High Court‑‑‑Only grievance made on behalf of petitioner was that the observations made in the impugned order were likely to affect the decision of the appeal on merits‑‑‑Held, observations made in the impugned order were of tentative nature which of course would not affect the decision of the appeal on merits‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal was disposed of accordingly. Ch. Muhammad Ibrahim, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Judgment & Decree
ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA; J.‑‑‑Petitioner seeks cancellation of bail granted to the respondent/convicts by the learned Judge in the High Court. The only grievance made by the learned counsel, however, is that the observations made in the impugned order are likely to affect the decision of the appeal on merits. Needless to observe that any observations made in the impugned order are of tentative nature which, of course, shall not affect the decision of the appeal on merits. With this observation, this petition is disposed of. N.H.Q./L‑101/S Petition disposed of accordingly.