2014 P Cr (PLP)
MURAD AMIR SHAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2014 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Islamabad |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MURAD AMIR SHAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2014 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2014 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Islamabad bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2014 P Cr (PLP) (MURAD AMIR SHAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Jan Muhammad Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 30 & 34
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 336-B
Hurt by corrosive substance
Judicial Magistrate (S. 30, Cr.P.C.), jurisdiction of
Scope
Judicial Magistrate's powers of sentencing
Scope
Under S.30, Cr.P.C. any Magistrate with the powers under the said section was authorized to try any case, where the sentence was not death, however S. 34, Cr.P.C. put an embargo that the Magistrate could not award sentence exceeding seven years
Section 336-B, P.P.C. provided minimum punishment of 14 years, and the Judicial Magistrate could not award such punishment
Case under S. 336-B, P.P.C. was thus exclusively triable by the Sessions Judge and such case could not be sent to the Judicial Magistrate for trial
Illustration.
Judgment & Decree
RIAZ AHMED KHAN, J.
This judgment is directed to dispose of petition under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. filed against the order of learned Sessions Judge West, Islamabad, dated 18-5-2013.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/complainant lodged F.I.R. No.33 dated 23-1-2013, under sections 324, 109, 34, P.P.C. Police Station Golra, Islamabad, alleging therein that the accused/respondents had thrown acid on the petitioner; as a result of which his face and right hand had been affected. Main accused was arrested on the spot; whereas other accused had made his escape good. Originally the case was registered under sections 324/34, P.P.C. Challan was submitted in the Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate Section-30, (West) Islamabad, at the time of framing of charge, added section 336-B, P.P.C. Since the punishment provided under section 336-B, P.P.C. is Imprisonment for Life but not less than 14 years, so the learned Magistrate sent the case to learned Sessions Judge, (West) Islamabad for trial as the same was triable by the learned Sessions Judge. Learned Sessions Judge vide impugned order sent the case back to the Magistrate for trial and the said order has been impugned in the present petition.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the case was triable by the learned Sessions Judge and order of sending back the case to the Magistrate was illegal. It was further submitted that once the case was entrusted to the Sessions Judge, it could not be sent back, as the only way to send the case back to the Magistrate, was to set aside the order and remand the case.
4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel admitted that the case was triable by the learned Sessions Judge and the order of sending back the case to the learned Magistrate was not legal.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record.
6. Under section 30, Cr.P.C. any Magistrate with the powers of Section-30, is authorized to try any case, where the sentence is not death. However section 34, Cr.P.C. puts embargo on the Magistrate that the Magistrate cannot award sentence exceeding seven years. In the present case, section 336-B, P.P.C. was added wherein minimum punishment is 14 years and learned Magistrate, could not award such punishment. The case was exclusively triable by the learned Sessions Judge and as such the order of sending the case back to the Court of Magistrate was illegal.
7. In the circumstances, impugned order is set aside with the direction that the case be entrusted to the Court of Sessions Judge for trial in accordance with law and rules.
8. In view of above mentioned facts, petition stands accepted. MWA/24/ISL. Petition accepted.