SCMR 2024

2024 PLP 1338 (SCMR)

N/A

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Original Petition No.06 of 2024, decided on 17th May, 2024.
Honorable Judges
Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Irfan Saadat Khan and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2024 PLP 1338 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Irfan Saadat Khan and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ
Parties N/A
Primary Law Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP 1338 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP 1338 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Qazi Faez Isa, CJ, Irfan Saadat Khan and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP 1338 (SCMR) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003)

Headnotes / Summary

(Contempt proceedings against Senator Faisal Vawda on account of his press conference in the National Press Club, Islamabad on 15.05.2024).

S. 3

Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 19 & 204

Press conferences by a Senator and a Member of the National Assembly ("MNA")

Malicious allegations against the Judiciary

Comments on the Judges of the superior courts

Speaking about sub judice cases

Contempt proceedings against the Senator and MNA

Issuance of show cause notices

Press conferences in question were streamed on the internet and social media forums and extracts from them were published in different newspapers

Article 19 of the Constitution grants to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression but places restrictions, amongst others, with regard to contempt of Court

Prima facie what was said by the Senator and the MNA appeared to be contempt of Court

Supreme Court issued show cause notices to both of them and granted them an opportunity to submit their explanation/ reply within two weeks of the receipt of the show cause notice

Supreme Court directed that television channels and all those who broadcast, re-broadcast and/or publish material constituting contempt of Court may also be committing contempt of Court, therefore, they should desist from doing so, failing which they may also be proceeded against for contempt of Court. Ch. Aamir Rehman, Addl. Attorney General and Raja Muhammad Shafqat Abbasi, D.A.G. (On Court Notice). Ch. M. Younas, Member Executive, Asim Ali Bokahri, Member Executive Committee and Rifaqat Islam Awan, Finance Secretary (On behalf of SCBA).

Judgment & Decree

1. On 15 May 2024 Senator Faisal Vawda held a press conference at the National Press Club, Islamabad which was broadcast live on a number of television channels. In the press conference he apparently levelled several malicious and serious allegations against the Judiciary, commented on the Judges of the superior courts and spoke about sub judice cases, including those before this Court. The press conference was also streamed on the internet and social media forums and extracts from his talk were published in different newspapers.

2. After the matter of Senator Faisal Vawda was numbered as Criminal Original No.6 of 2024 a similar press conference was conducted by Mr. Mustafa Kamal, Member of the National Assembly ('MNA'), on 16 May 2024, also at the National Press Club, Islamabad, and which was also broadcast live on a number of television channels. In the press conference he apparently levelled several malicious and serious allegations against the Judiciary, commented on the Judges of the superior courts and spoke about sub judice cases, including those before this Court. The press conference was also streamed on the internet and social media forums and extracts from his talk were published in different newspapers.

3. Article 19 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan ('the Constitution') grants to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression but places restrictions, amongst others, with regard to contempt of Court. Article 204 of the Constitution defines contempt of Court and empowers this Court to punish any person who: '(a) abuses, interferes with or obstructs the process of the Court in any way or disobeys any order of the Court; (b) scandalizes the Court or otherwise does anything which tends to bring the Court or a Judge of the Court into hatred, ridicule or contempt; (c) does anything which tends to prejudice the determination of a matter pending before the Court; or (d) does any other thing which, by law, constitutes contempt of the Court.' Contempt of Court is further attended to by the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003.

4. Prima facie what was said by Senator Faisal Vawda appears to be contempt of Court, therefore, we are constrained to issue show cause notice to him and Senator Faisal Vawda is granted an opportunity to submit his explanation/ reply within two weeks of the receipt of the show cause notice. He is directed to be in attendance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Show cause notice to him be sent at his residential address and also to the Secretariat of the Senate of Pakistan.

5. What Mr. Mustafa Kamal, MNA, said also prima facie appears to be contempt of Court, therefore, we are constrained to issue show cause notice to him and Mr. Mustafa Kamal, MNA, is granted an opportunity to submit his explanation/ reply within two weeks of the receipt of the show cause notice. He is directed to be in attendance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Show cause notice be sent to him at his residential address and also to the Secretariat of the National Assembly.

6. Notice be also issued to the Attorney-General for Pakistan, under rule 7(2) of Order XXVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, who shall conduct the proceedings. Copy of this order be sent to the learned Attorney-General.

7. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) is directed to submit recording of said two press-conferences together with their complete transcripts, including that of the question and answer session.

8. That television channels and all those who broadcast, re-broadcast and/or publish material constituting contempt of Court may also be committing contempt of Court, therefore, they should desist from doing so, failing which they may also be proceeded against contempt of Court. To come up on Wednesday, 5 June, 2024. MWA/C-12/SC Order accordingly.