PCRLJ 1994

1994 P Cr (PLP)

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1993-November-13
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD YOUSUF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD YOUSUF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34

Bail, grant of

Accused was empty-handed at the time of occurrence and did not contribute towards the death of the deceased

Accused had also been declared innocent by three investigating agencies including the Provincial Crimes Branch

Accused was in custody for about one year

Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34

Bail, grant of

Accused was empty-handed at the time of occurrence and did not contribute towards the death of the deceased

Accused had also been declared innocent by three investigating agencies including the Provincial Crimes Branch

Accused was in custody for about one year

Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner. Zaeemul Farooq Malik, A.A.-G. for the State Date of hearing: 13th November, 1993 It is being submitted by the Police Officer, present in Court, that Muhammad Yusuf petitioner who was admittedly empty-handed during the occurrence in question had been declared innocent through successive investigations conducted by the local police and the Provincial Crimes Branch and had even been recommended to be discharged. Adds that the learned Illaqa Magistrate, however, had not agreed with these repeated findings of various investigating agencies in favour of Yusuf petitioner.

2. Be that as it may, the petitioner who was empty-handed at the time of occurrence, did not make any contribution towards the death of the deceased A persons. He had been declared innocent by the three investigating agencies including the Provincial Crime Branch and in the circumstances he had made out a case for his release on bail.

3. Consequently, Yusuf petitioner who has been in custody for about one year is admitted to bail in case F.I.R. No.544/92 of Police Station Chimot Saddar, Chiniot of District Jhang subject to his furnishing security in sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Chiniot. N.H.Q./M-1302/L Bail granted.