1990 PLP 307 (SCMR)
ALLAH DITTA and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1990 PLP 307 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan and Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | ALLAH DITTA and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 307 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 307 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 307 (SCMR) (ALLAH DITTA and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rafique Ahmad Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanveer Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 25th September, 1989.
- Zahid Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana M.A. Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan, dated 30-7-1989, passed in Cr. Miscellaneous No.847/B of 1989).
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307, 379 & 302/149
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)
Case had already been fixed for evidence by Trial Court and therefore no ground was made out for grant of leave
Petition was dismissed in circumstances. Zahid Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana M.A. Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307, 379 & 302/149
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)
Case had already been fixed for evidence by Trial Court and therefore no ground was made out for grant of leave
Petition was dismissed in circumstances. Rafique Ahmad Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanveer Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Zahid Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana M.A. Qadri, Advocate-on-Record for the State. Date of hearing: 25th September, 1989. USMAN ALI SHAH, J.--Leave to appeal has been sought by the petitioners against the order of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, dated 30-7-1989, whereby their Cr. Misc. application for the grant of bail was rejected. The petitioners were charged under sections 307, 379, 302/14/149, P.P.C. vide F.I.R. No. 183 dated 9-6-1987 at Police Station Jalalpur Pirwala alongwith their other co-accused for the murder of Faiz Bakhsh. They were arrested on 21-6-1987 and since then they are in judicial custody. Their application for the grant of bail was rejected by the learned trial Judge on the ground that on nine dates of hearing adjournments were sought "on account of the accused" vide order dated 12-7-1989. Against this order the petitioners filed criminal miscellaneous application before the learned High Court which was also dismissed by the learned Single Judge, vide his order dated 30-7-1989 on the ground that the next hearing in the case for the evidence is fixed on 17-9-1989. After hearing the learned counsel in support of this petition we find no reason to take a different view in the matter from that of the learned High Court as according to the learned counsel the next hearing in the case for the evidence is fixed on 3-10-1989 by the trial Court. Hence no ground is made out for the grant of leave. The petition is accordingly dismissed. N.H.Q./A-650/S Petition dismissed.