1981 PLP 1745 (CLC)
Mst. SHAMSUNISSA‑Appellant Versus Smt. NIRMALA‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1745 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. SHAMSUNISSA‑Appellant Versus Smt. NIRMALA‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1745 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1745 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1745 (CLC) (Mst. SHAMSUNISSA‑Appellant Versus Smt. NIRMALA‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ajaz Ali Hakro for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 10‑Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), S. 11
Disconnection of electricity‑Landlady appellant alleged to have disconnected supply of electricity in respect of respondent's tenement held on tenancy‑Appellant disowning to have supplied such electricity
Rent Controller holding in favour of appellant but permitting respondent to have such connection made at her own expense without claiming for its refund from landlord‑High Court although while hearing second appeal competent to maintain order under appeal on a ground other than which found favour with Courts below, yet impugned portion of order allowing electric connection at tenant's own cost being not supported by any other ground as well impugned order, held, cannot be maintained‑Attitude of landlady however deplored as very unreasonable.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Appeal No. 469 of 1980, decided on 16th April, 1981.
S. 10‑Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), S. 11
Disconnection of electricity‑Landlady appellant alleged to have disconnected supply of electricity in respect of respondent's tenement held on tenancy‑Appellant disowning to have supplied such electricity
Rent Controller holding in favour of appellant but permitting respondent to have such connection made at her own expense without claiming for its refund from landlord‑High Court although while hearing second appeal competent to maintain order under appeal on a ground other than which found favour with Courts below, yet impugned portion of order allowing electric connection at tenant's own cost being not supported by any other ground as well impugned order, held, cannot be maintained‑Attitude of landlady however deplored as very unreasonable. Samiullah v. Mian Muhammad Salim, District Judge, Rawalpindi P L D 1966 Lah. 572 ref. S. Madad Ali Shah for Appellant. Ajaz Ali Hakro for Respondent. Date of hearing : 16th April, 1981.