2003 PLP 1330 (SCMR)
ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus Mst. ANWAR BIBI and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2003 PLP 1330 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus Mst. ANWAR BIBI and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 1330 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 1330 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 1330 (SCMR) (ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus Mst. ANWAR BIBI and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Asim laffri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 24th May, 2002.
Headnotes / Summary
(On review from the judgment/order dated 21-6-2001 passed by Supreme Court of Pakistan in C.P No.2050-L of 2001).
O. XXVI, R.1
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 188
All the arguments were heard at the time of disposal of petition for leave to appeal and it was concluded that no case was made out for interference by Supreme Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction under Art.185(3) of the Constitution
Same arguments were repeated, therefore, in view of limited scope of review, no case was made out under Art. 188 of the Constitution
Petition was dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.
We have heard the learned counsel and have also perused the judgment passed by learned High Court, dated 31-5-2001 particularly with reference to decision on Issues Nos. 1 and 2 pertaining to the fact "as to whether the respondent/plaintiff has a preferential right of pre-emption having contiguous property with the property of petitioner/defendant as well as with regard to the customs of pre-emption in the locality in which the property is situated. It may be noted that even at the time of disposal of petition for leave to appeal all the .4rguments were heard and it was concluded that no case is made out for interference by this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction under Article 185(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Today again the position is the same and same arguments have been repeated by the learned counsel, therefore, we are of the opinion that the scope of review is very limited, as such, no case is made out for exercise of jurisdiction under Article 188 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Thus we see no force in the petition, which is hereby dismissed. M.H./A-281/S Petition dismissed.