MLD 1994

1994 PLP 584 (MLD)

SIKANDER HAYAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1993-October-5
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 584 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties SIKANDER HAYAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 584 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 584 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 584 (MLD) (SIKANDER HAYAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Mahmood Ahmad Bhatti for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497(1), first proviso

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392/411

Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17-- Bail, grant of

Accused appeared to be little more than 15 years of age and was in jail for the last about seven months

Accused, therefore, was entitled to the benefit of first proviso of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.

Accused was allowed bail accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

This petition has been moved seeking grant of bail to Sikander Hayat, petitioner, who stands arrested since 26-2-1993 in case F.I.R. No.51 of 1993 dated 23-2-1993, under section 392/411, P.P.C. read with section 17 of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station Kot Momin, District Sargodha.

2. According to the prosecution, Bashir Ahmad, complainant owned a Car No.4604/LHA Toyota Corolla, Model 1980, which he used to ply as taxi. On the fateful day, the petitioner alongwith Shamas-ul-Haq contacted the complainant at taxi stand Kot Momin and hired his car fixing the fare as Rs.150. The petitioner and his aforesaid companion sat in the car and the complainant drove it towards the destination. When they reached near Kot Momin, one Khalid Mahmood, co-accused of the petitioner, who was standing on the roadside, signalled the car to stop and he too sat in the car. They had covered a little distance when Khalid Mahmood placed his pistol on the temple of the complainant and forced him out of the car and then bound him down with a tree with a rope and took away the car. The matter was reported at the police station the same day. During a chase by the police on 26-2-1993 the petitioner and his two co-accused were hauled up while travelling in the aforesaid said stolen car which had been seized. The petitioner's bail plea was declined by the lower Court, hence this petition.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has made two fold submissions. Firstly that the petitioner is in jail for the last about 8 months without trial and secondly that he is less than 16 years of age as per copy of birth certificate showing his date of birth as 15-7-1978, therefore, it is urged that the petitioner is entitled to benefit of the proviso (1) of subsection (1) of section 497, Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for State has however opposed the petition.

4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner appears to be little more than 15 years of age who is in jail for the last about seven months, therefore, in the circumstances of the case, he is entitled to the benefit of proviso (1) of subsection (1) of section 497, Cr.P.C. Consequently I allow this petition and direct that the petitioner be released subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate concerned. N.H.Q./S-388/L Bail allowed.