SCMR 1999

1999SCMR1127 (PLP)

Lahore and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD YAQUB BUTT, ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR,

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Appeal No.477 of 1994, decided on 8th October, 1998.
Honorable Judges
Ajmal Mian, C. J., Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999SCMR1127 (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Ajmal Mian, C. J., Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ
Parties Lahore and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD YAQUB BUTT, ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR,
Primary Law Civil service
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999SCMR1127 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999SCMR1127 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Ajmal Mian, C. J., Munawar Ahmed Mirza and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999SCMR1127 (PLP) (Lahore and another — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD YAQUB BUTT, ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil service

Representation

  • M. Zaman Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Appellants.
  • M.A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 8th October, 1998.
  • 3. Mr. M. Zaman Bhatti, learned Advocate Supreme Court appearing in support of the appellant has vehemently contended that the impugned judgment is not in accordance with law and, therefore, it should be set aside. However, we have noticed that the respondent had already been retired from service w.e.f. 5th April, 1991 and the High Court had now been conferred with the power to create/upgrade any appointment by means of itself since 1995 .

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 17-6-1992 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 1925 of 1991).

Powers of High Court under its Constitutional jurisdiction under Art .199 of the Constitution to upgrade post

High Court had found that civil servant who stood promoted to BS 19 on regular basis, was entitled to move-over to B.S.20 after one year of his promotion to B.S,19

Validity

Leave to appeal was granted by Supreme Court to consider whether High Court was competent to upgrade any appointment without approval of Provincial Government particularly when up gradation involved financial implications

Civil servant had already stood retired and as High Court had acquired necessary powers to upgrade post, appeal was dismissed and leave granting order was recalled in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

AJMAL MIAN, C.J.

This is an appeal with the leave of this Court against the judgment, dated 17-6-1992 passed by a Division Bench of Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No. 1925 of 1991 filed by the respondent, allowing the same by declaring that "the petitioner stands promoted to B.S. 19 on regular oasis w.e.f. 1-12-1986 and entitled to move-over to B.S.20 w.e.f. 1-12-1987 and the respondents are hereby directed to issue formal notification forthwith and grant him all the benefits following therefrom".

2. Leave to appeal was granted to consider, whether the High Court was competent to upgrade any appointment without the approval of the Provincial Government particularly when the up gradation involved financial complication.

3. Mr. M. Zaman Bhatti, learned Advocate Supreme Court appearing in support of the appellant has vehemently contended that the impugned judgment is not in accordance with law and, therefore, it should be set aside. However, we have noticed that the respondent had already been retired from service w.e.f. 5th April, 1991 and the High Court had now been conferred with the power to create/upgrade any appointment by means of itself since 1995 .

4. Since the respondent has already stood retired and as the High Court has acquired the necessary powers to upgrade the post though in 1995, in our view it is not a fit case where we should examine the vires of the above order of the High Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed and leave granting order is recalled. H.B.T./G-32/S Appeal dismissed.