SCMR 2019

2019 PLP 734 (SCMR)

Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No. 639 of 2019, decided on 26th March, 2019.
Honorable Judges
Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, C.J.,Sajjad Ali Shah and Yahya Afridi, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2019 PLP 734 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, C.J.,Sajjad Ali Shah and Yahya Afridi, JJ
Parties Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Primary Law National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2019 PLP 734 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2019 PLP 734 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, C.J.,Sajjad Ali Shah and Yahya Afridi, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2019 PLP 734 (SCMR) (Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF — Petitioner Versus The STATE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)

Representation

  • Khawaja Haris Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Muhammad Zubair Khalid, Advocate Supreme Court and Sher Afgan Asadi, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 26th March, 2019.

Headnotes / Summary

(Against the order dated 25.02.2019 passed by the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad in Writ Petition No. 352 of 2019)

Ss. 9(a)(v) & 14(c)

Corruption and corrupt practices

Suspension of sentence

Admission to bail for a few weeks to allow the convict to seek medical treatment

Petitioner had been convicted by the Accountability Court in respect of offences under Ss. 9(a)(v) & 14(c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years along with fine

Medical history of petitioner brought on record did suggest that he had a long history of various ailments including cardiac complications, kidney problems, hypertension and diabetes

After extending due deference to the consistent medical opinion of senior doctors available on record, the prayer made by the petitioner regarding his admission to bail upon suspension of his sentence for a limited period was found to be reasonable

Petitioner was admitted to bail for a period of six weeks upon suspension of his sentence subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. Five million with two sureties each in the like amount, with the directions that the petitioner shall not leave or be allowed to leave the country; that bail granted to petitioner shall automatically stand cancelled upon expiry of six weeks whereupon the petitioner shall surrender to custody voluntarily failing which he shall be taken into custody; that surrender to custody shall not include surrendering before a court with an application for bail, and that the petitioner may get himself medically treated from medical practitioners and medical facilities of his choice in the country. Nayyar Rizvi, Additional Prosecutor-General, Accountability, Jehanzeb Barwana, Special Prosecutor, Accountability, Naeem Tariq Sanghera, Special Prosecutor, Accountability, Arshad Qayyum, Special Prosecutor, Accountability, Dr. Qadeer Alam, AIG (Legal) (Prison) and Asim Javed, D.S. Home Department for the State.

Judgment & Decree

ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, C.J.

Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 2667 of 2019 This miscellaneous application is allowed and the document appended therewith is permitted to be brought on the record of the main petition. Disposed of. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 2265 of 2019

2. This miscellaneous application is allowed and the concise statement of respondent No. 2 appended therewith is allowed to be brought on the record of the main petition. Disposed of. Civil Petition No. 639 of 2019

3. Through this petition Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif petitioner has sought leave to appeal against the order dated 25.02.2019 passed by a learned Division Bench of the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad in Writ Petition No. 352 of 2019 whereby a prayer made by him regarding suspension of sentence and release on bail in a pending criminal appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.

4. The petitioner had been convicted by the Accountability Court-II, Islamabad in Reference No. 19 of 2017 in respect of an offence under section 9(a)(v) read with section 14(c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine apart from some other sentences. The petitioner challenged his conviction and sentence before the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad through an appeal and during the pendency of that appeal he filed Writ Petition No. 352 of 2019 seeking suspension of his sentence and release on bail during the pendency of the appeal but on 25.02.2019 the said Writ Petition was dismissed by a learned Division Bench of the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad. Hence, the present petition before this Court.

5. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length and have gone through the relevant record appended with this petition.

6. After addressing elaborate arguments in support of the petitioner's prayer for bail upon suspension of his sentence the learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail upon suspension of his sentence for a period up to eight weeks so as to provide him an opportunity of proper medical treatment of his choice and upon expiry of the requisite period the petitioner shall voluntarily surrender to custody regarding which the learned counsel for the petitioner has undertaken on behalf of the petitioner. The learned Additional Prosecutor-General, Accountability appearing for the National Accountability Bureau has, however, opposed the said prayer maintaining that the petitioner is a convicted prisoner who is already being offered as well as afforded the best medical treatment and facilities available in the country.

7. The medical reports of the petitioner brought on the record of the case do suggest that he has a long history of various ailments including cardiac complications, kidney problem, hypertension and diabetes. Some of the reports prepared by the Medical Boards and available on the record clearly recommend that "the patient's current symptoms necessitate coronary angiography, after nephrologist clearance" and that "the patient needs cardiac catheterization, for further management, in view of his symptoms of angina. Because of long standing history of comorbidities and complicated cardiac surgical history, a nephrologist and cardiac surgical backup is recommended during the cath." It has clearly been mentioned in such reports that while undergoing angiography the petitioner "will be at a mild moderate risk of contrast including nephropathy". In this peculiar backdrop, and extending due deference to the consistent medical opinion of senior doctors available on the record, the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding admission of the petitioner to bail upon suspension of his sentence for a limited period has been found by us to be reasonable. This petition is, therefore, converted into an appeal and the same is allowed and consequently the petitioner is admitted to bail upon suspension of his sentence subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000,000/- (Rupees five million only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar (Judicial) of this Court in the following terms: i) The sentence of the petitioner handed down by the Accountability Court-II, Islamabad in Reference No. 19 of 2017 in respect of an offence under section 9(a)(v) read with section 14(c) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 is suspended and he is admitted to bail for a period of six weeks from the date of his release as a consequence of this order. It is made clear that during this period the petitioner shall not leave or be allowed to leave the country. ii) Bail granted to the petitioner through the present order shall automatically stand canceled upon expiry of six weeks from the date of his release whereupon the petitioner shall surrender to custody voluntarily failing which he shall be retaken into custody. Surrender to custody by the petitioner shall not include surrendering before a court with an application for bail. iii) During the above mentioned period of six weeks the petitioner may get himself medically treated from medical practitioners and medical facilities of his choice in Pakistan. iv) If during that period of six weeks the appeal filed by the petitioner before the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad is finally decided by the said Court then upon such decision custody of the petitioner shall thereafter be regulated by an order of the High Court to be passed in that regard, if need be. MWA/M-14/SC Bail granted.