2006 PLP 1307 (YLR)
HAMZA NAZIR and others — Petitioners Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BZU, MULTAN — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1307 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Maulvi Anwarul Haq, J |
| Parties | HAMZA NAZIR and others — Petitioners Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BZU, MULTAN — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1307 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1307 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Maulvi Anwarul Haq, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1307 (YLR) (HAMZA NAZIR and others — Petitioners Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BZU, MULTAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muzaffar Abbas Kazmi for Petitioners.
- Muhammad Tariq Rajwana for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Arts.8 & 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioners who after failure in second semester were dropped from M.Sc. course applied for re-admission but same was refused by the University
Petitioners were seeking re-admission on usual terms and not as a very special favour
If the University had made any re-admissions in similar circumstances then petitioners could not be allowed to be discriminated in matter of re-admission
University was directed to entertain application for re-admission, if properly presented by the petitioners, without discrimination. Zahoor Ahmed Azhar v. Islamia University, Bahawalpur through Vice-Chancellor and 4 others PLD 1998 Lah 324 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J.
Learned counsel contends that the petitioners having failed in the 2nd semester were dropped from M.Sc. (Physics) course. They applied for re-admission and the same has been denied to them by respondent No.2-committee.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that several instances are there where re-admission has been granted in similar circumstances. Learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand, contends that two wrongs cannot make one right with reference to the case of "Zahoor Ahmed Azhar v. Islamia University, Bahawalpur through Vice-Chancellor and 4 others" (PLD 1998 Lahore 324).
3. I am afraid the petitioners are seeking re-admission on usual terms and not a very special favour and in case the university has made re-admissions in similar circumstances then the petitioner cannot be allowed to be discriminated in the matter of said re-admission.
4. The petitioners to immediately approach respondent No.1 with a properly drafted application giving details and particulars of the cases of re-admission and respondent No.1/Vice-Chancellor to decide the matter in strict accordance with law and ensure that no discrimination is caused to the petitioners. The writ petition is disposed of. A copy of this order to be immediately remitted to respondent No.1. It will be appreciated if the matter is decided within four weeks of the presentation of the said application of the petitioners. F.B./H-5/L Petition disposed of