2003 P Cr (PLP)
Mst. KAUSAR PERVEEN alias KAUSAR BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2003 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ch. Iftikhar Hussain, J |
| Parties | Mst. KAUSAR PERVEEN alias KAUSAR BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ch. Iftikhar Hussain, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. KAUSAR PERVEEN alias KAUSAR BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Faqir Muhammad for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979). Ss. 10(2)/16‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused, being a lady, S.497, Cr.P.C., first proviso was attracted to her case under which a lady accused was ordinarily entitled to bail‑‑‑Accused had been behind the bars and was not a previous convict‑‑‑Accused was granted bail in circumstances. Sher Muhammad v. Muhammad Sadiq and 2 others 1984 PCr.LJ 3126 and Mst. Sakina Bibi v. The State 1984 PCr.LJ 1010 ref. Nasrullah Khan Kakar for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Nasrullah Khan Kakar for the State. Mst. Kausar Perveen alias Kausar Bibi has sought for post‑arrest bail in Case F.I.R. No.133 dated 20‑6‑2002 under section 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VII of 1979 registered with Police Station Makhdum Rashid, Multan. Later on, the police have added section 10(2) of the said Ordinance.
2. Briefly the prosecution case as per F.I.R. is that on 6‑6‑2002 at Fajjar Prayer call time, the complainant Muhammad Yaqoob on the alarm raised by his daughter Kausar Perveen woke up and saw that Abid, Sadiq alias Shada and Muhammad Akhtar had taken her away forcibly in the car for the purpose of Zina. They had also taken away his gold ornaments and cash amount. The police have arrayed her as an accused being consenting party to Zina with her co‑accused Muhammad Hanif.
3. The bail has been sought by her on the solitary ground of being woman and so her case falling within the first proviso to section 497(1), Cr.P.C. In support of the same she has placed reliance upon the case of Sher Muhammad v. Muhammad Sadiq and 2 others 1984 PCr. LJ 3126 (Karachi) and Mst. Sakina Bibi v. The State 1984 PCr. LJ 1010 (Lahore).
4. Conversely, the learned counsel for the State has opposed the petition on the ground that she has been found to be consenting party to Zina, which offence is heinous in nature as well as covered under the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.
5. I have carefully considered the submissions from both sides with the help of available record.
6. She is woman. The first proviso to section 497(1), Cr.P.C. is attracted to her case. The female accused on such ground ordinarily is entitled to bail and in this regard reference can be made to the case of Sher Muhammad v. Muhammad Sadiq and 2 others 1984 PCr. LJ 3126 (Karachi) and Mst. Sakina Bibi v. The State 1984 PCr. LJ 1010 (Lahore).
7. She is behind the bars and stated to be previous non‑convict.
8. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to exercise my discretion in her favour.
9. I, therefore, accept this petition and admit her, to bail subject to her furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. S.M.A.H./K‑173/L Bail granted.