1990SCMR494 (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SHARIF and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ASGHAR and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990SCMR494 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Ghulam Mujaddid |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHARIF and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ASGHAR and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990SCMR494 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990SCMR494 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Ghulam Mujaddid.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990SCMR494 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SHARIF and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ASGHAR and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Latif Khan Khosa, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Abul Asim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l.
- Date of hearing: 19th June, 1989.
- Sh. Saeedul Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 27‑6‑1983 in Criminal Appeal No.263 of 1981 and Criminal Revision No.561 of 1981). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider whether High Court did not properly appreciate quantum of sentence‑‑‑Parties were permitted to make necessary application to the Court in case they came to any settlement with regard to question of compensation. Sh. Saeedul Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Latif Khan Khosa, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Abul Asim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l. Sh. Saeedul Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State. Date of hearing: 19th June, 1989. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Muhammad Sharif and Muhammad Riaz seek leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 27‑6‑1983 whereby the appeal of the respondents was allowed partly and the revision filed by Bashir Ahmad was dismissed in limine. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that according to his information Rehmat respondent is stated to be dead. So qua him this petition has abated. With regard to the remaining respondents, it was argued that the High Court did not properly appreciate the quantum of sentence and compensation. There is good deal of force in the submission. So we grant leave to appeal to examine just the question of sentence. Asghar respondent is reported to be in jail. He shall not be released till the appeal is finally disposed of. Bailable warrants against the others. The parties are related inter se. In cases they come to any settlement with regard to the question of compensation, they are permitted to make necessary application to this Court. M.A.K./M‑1058/S Leave granted.