1989SCMR464 (PLP)
INAYAT BEGUM and others — Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989SCMR464 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah andSaad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | INAYAT BEGUM and others — Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), ---S.13--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)--Eviction of tenants was allowed by Rent Controller but rejected in appeal by District Court- Constitutional petition by landlord against appellate Court's order was dismissed by High Court--Order of High Court impugned--Parties had entered into meaningful negotiations, there being every likelihood of settlement out of Court |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR464 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), ---S.13--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)--Eviction of tenants was allowed by Rent Controller but rejected in appeal by District Court- Constitutional petition by landlord against appellate Court's order was dismissed by High Court--Order of High Court impugned--Parties had entered into meaningful negotiations, there being every likelihood of settlement out of Court as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR464 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah andSaad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR464 (PLP) (INAYAT BEGUM and others — Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Sair Ali, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Ali Imam Naqvi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- S.M. Zubair, Additional Advocate-General, Punjab and Rao M.Yousaf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 10th September, 1988.
- Muhammad Sair Ali, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Ali Imam Naqvi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- S.M. Zubair, Additional Advocate‑General, Punjab and Rao M.Yousaf Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 28-9-1987 in W.P. No.2927/87). To afford further opportunity for negotiations in the context that the question of studies of students of the Girls School concerned as tenant in the present cases being involved, leave to appeal was granted which was not objected to from the respondents' side.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑These two petitions by the landlord side in Rent Restriction matter are directed against the dismissal by the High Court of their Writ Petitions. Earlier the eviction application against the respondents side was allowed by the learned Rent Controller but the respondents' appeal was allowed by the District Court. These petitions were heard by this Bench last week. The parties have entered into meaningful negotiations and settlement out of Court. Both the learned counsel have today stated that there is every likelihood of a settlement out of Court. In order to afford a further opportunity for negotiations in the context that the question of the studies of students of the Girls School concerned as tenant in these cases is also involved, we grant leave to appeal. Grant of leave has not been objected to from the respondents side. Security Rs.5,000 in each case. The appeals shall be prepared on the present record with direction to the parties concerned to file all necessary additional documents. To come up in the month of November, 1988. AA./I‑57/S Leave to appeal granted.