2007 PLP 2892(1) (YLR)
Mst. GULSHAN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION GULGASHT, MULTAN and 3others — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2892(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Iqbal Hameed ur Rehman, J |
| Parties | Mst. GULSHAN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION GULGASHT, MULTAN and 3others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2892(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2892(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Iqbal Hameed ur Rehman, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2892(1) (YLR) (Mst. GULSHAN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION GULGASHT, MULTAN and 3others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Tariq Rajwana for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioner had stated that She being Sui Juris had contracted marriage with the other petitioner with her own free-will and consent according to Sharia and Nikah had duly been registered
Petitioner had alleged that her .father who was annoyed with said marriage, in connivance with police officials was pressurizing petitioner to get divorce from her husband
Police officials were directed by the High Court to act 'strictly in accordance with law and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of petitioner and her husband and not to cause harassment to them illegally.
Judgment & Decree
IQBAL HAMEEDUR RAHMAN, J.
It is stated that petitioner No.1 being sui juris contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 with her own freewill and consent according to Sharia and Nikah was duly registered and that father of petitioner No. l respondent No.4 is annoyed with the said marriage and he in connivance with respondents Nos.1 & 2 is pressurizing the petitioner to get divorce from her husband.
2. Respondents Nos.1 & 2 are directed to act strictly in accordance with law and not to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioner and her husband and also not to cause harassment to them illegally.
3. With these directions, the petition stands disposed of. H.B.T./G-23/L Order accordingly.