2007 PLP 1017(1) (CLC)
ABDUL MAJEED — Petitioner Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1017(1) (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDUL MAJEED — Petitioner Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1017(1) (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1017(1) (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1017(1) (CLC) (ABDUL MAJEED — Petitioner Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ijaz Ahmad Khan for petitioner.
- Saleem Anwar Khan for Respondent No.1.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 9(5)(a)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Ex parte proceedings against defendant, order of
Defendant's plea as to wrong noting of date of hearing
Such question of fact could not be resolved without enabling parties to produce evidence
High Court directed defendant to make proper application before Family Court, who would frame an issue and decide, after recording evidence, whether he had noted the date wrongly and was erroneously proceeded ex parte.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J.
The petitioner has been proceeded ex parte and this order has been challenged by the petitioner and his case is that he has wrongly, noted the date; this is controverted by the counsel for the respondent. Obviously, this is a question of fact, which cannot be resolved without enabling the parties to produce evidence. Let the petitioner move a proper application before the learned Judge Family Court, who shall frame an issue and after recording the evidence decide, whether he has noted the date wrongly and was erroneously proceeded ex parte. Disposed of. S.A.K./A-127/L Order accordingly.