1989 P Cr (PLP)
FAIZ BAKHSH and 5 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | FAIZ BAKHSH and 5 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (FAIZ BAKHSH and 5 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Muhammad Anwar Shah for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302/307, 326, 325 & 324/148/149‑‑Bail; grant of‑‑More than two years had passed since arrest of accused, but trial had not been concluded despite directions given by High Court in that respect‑‑No fault on part of accused established‑‑Bail granted.
Judgment & Decree
Syed Muhammad Anwar Shah for Petitioner. This is an application for grant of bail to Faiz Bakhsh, Aziz and Saida sons of Budhan, Rashid, Shabbir and Majeed sons of Rasool Bakhsh and Riaz son of Kalu petitioners in case under sections 302/307, 326/325, 324/148/149, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Shedani, vide F.I.R. No.140/1985, dated 22‑9‑1985.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners caused the death of Ghulam Fareed and injuries to the complainant on 21‑9‑1985 in the area of Mauza Chauhan of Police Station Shedam.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that although more than 2 years have passed since arrest of the petitioners yet the trial has not been concluded despite directions given by this Court. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.
4. I have considered the matter. I find that the petitioners were arrested on 4‑10‑1985; that they earlier had applied for their release on bail on the ground of statutory delay in the conclusion of the trial but the same was rejected by me on 25‑5‑1988 with the directions that the trial Court should decide the case before 10‑7‑1988 but despite the directions given by this Court, no progress has been made in the trial of the case without any fault on the part of the petitioners.
5. That being the position, there is no option but to accept this application. The petitioners will be released on furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000 with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C /Duty, Magistrate, Rahimyar Khan. H.B.T./F‑102/L Bail granted.