2004 PLP 375 (SCMR)
ZEBA KHAN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION GULBERG, LAHORE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2004 PLP 375 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, JJ |
| Parties | ZEBA KHAN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION GULBERG, LAHORE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 375 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 375 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 375 (SCMR) (ZEBA KHAN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION GULBERG, LAHORE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ms. Asma Jehangir, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents
- Date of hearing: 28th May, 2002.
- 2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner addressed arguments at a considerable length during course whereof she stated that on behalf of petitioner, she contemplates to file a complaint before the competent Court of jurisdiction but her problem is that there are certain observations made by the learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court, Lahore in the impugned judgment on account of which there is probability that might relief she wanted to get, would not be granted. She further stated that if this Court observes that if such complaint is filed by petitioner, that would be taken into consideration independently, in -accordance with law and without being influenced in any manner from the observation made by the learned High Court in impugned judgment, she would not press this petition.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order dated 18-3-1999 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore in Intra-Court Appeal No.625 of 1998).
Art.185(3)
Withdrawal of petition
Observations made in impugned judgment were of tentative nature
If any complaint was filed by petitioner for redressal of grievance, that would be dealt with independently in, accordance with law uninfluenced by observations made in the impugned judgment
Supreme Court dismissed petition as withdrawn with such observations.
Judgment & Decree
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.
This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 18th March, 1999 passed by., Lahore High Court, Lahore, whereby Intra-Court Appeal filed by petitioner has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner addressed arguments at a considerable length during course whereof she stated that on behalf of petitioner, she contemplates to file a complaint before the competent Court of jurisdiction but her problem is that there are certain observations made by the learned Division Bench of Lahore High Court, Lahore in the impugned judgment on account of which there is probability that might relief she wanted to get, would not be granted. She further stated that if this Court observes that if such complaint is filed by petitioner, that would be taken into consideration independently, in -accordance with law and without being influenced in any manner from the observation made by the learned High Court in impugned judgment, she would not press this petition.
3. We have heard the learned counsel and have taken into consideration the statement so made by her. In this behalf suffice it to say that the observations made in the impugned judgment are of tentative nature. However, we would like to observe that if such complaint is filed by complainant for the redressal of grievance, that would be dealt with independently, in accordance with the law, without being influenced from -the observations made by the learned High Court in the impugned judgment. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn in view of observation made hereinabove. S A K /Z-112/S Petition dismissed.