YLR 2010

2010 PLP 221 (YLR)

BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.154-B of 2009, decided on 25th March, 2009.
Honorable Judges
Habib Ullah Shakir, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2010 PLP 221 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Habib Ullah Shakir, J
Parties BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 221 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 221 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Habib Ullah Shakir, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 221 (YLR) (BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Naveed Khalil Chaudhry for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.322

Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.16

Qatl-bis-Sabab and enticement

Bail, grant of

Further inquiry

Real brothers of complainant's wife and other close relatives of complainant's wife as well as accused who was also nearest relative of the complainant party, corroborated each other saying that accused was not the cause of death of complainant's daughters, son and grand-daughter, but it was due to heavy pressure of water in the river and in that regard they all had sworn and submitted their affidavits during the investigation of the case

Complainant, however did not come forward during investigation to get recorded his statement and remained obstinate to his stance taken in the F.I.R.

Accused, during the investigation, was declared innocent by the Police and challan was submitted to the court

Case, in circumstances was fit one for further inquiry

Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Mohandra, Dy. P.G. for the State. Talat Mahmood Kakezai for the Complainant.

Judgment & Decree

HABIB ULLAH SHAKIR, J.--Through this petition, Bashir Ahmad, petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.92/2004, dated 14-8-2004, registered under section 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance No.VII of 1979 read with section 322, P.P.C, at Police Station Takhat Mehal, District Bahawalnagar.

2. Allegation against the petitioner, as per contents of the F.I.R, is that he being a nephew of the complainant's wife used to visit house of the complainant and had developed illicit relations with his daughters namely Mst. Zulaikhan and Mst. Naziran and on his forbidding the petitioner from visiting his house, his relations became strained with his wife Mst. Nooran and taking advantage of which situation on 13-8-2004, at 10.00 p.m., the petitioner, allegedly enticingly took complainant's wife Mst. Nooran Bibi, daughters Nazeeran, Sumera, Umera son, Ahmad Raza and maternal grand-daughter Saima with him towards River Satluj but while trying to cross it, without a boat, due to heavy pressure of water, except the petitioner and Mst. Nooran all other above named were drowned and their dead bodies were found consecutively later on.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated by the complainant mala fidely with the connivance of local police due to his suspicion that he had developed illicit relations with his daughter Mst. Zulaikhan Bibi. He has added that neither did he enticed away anyone nor he established illicit relations with Mst. Zulaikhan. Further added that close relatives of the complainant's wife had also submitted their affidavits, before the police, deposing that after having quarrelled with the complainant Mst. Nooran along with her drowned children and grant-daughter left for her mother's house situated at Ludan. The learned counsel has argued that as per contents of the F.I.R. that alleged offence was not made out during the course of investigation therefore, section 496-A P.P.C. was deleted and the petitioner/Bashir Ahmad was declared innocent by the police concerned. But due to obstinacy of the complainant and not coming to join the investigation, the Investigating Officer placed the petitioner in column No.2 and sent him to judicial lock-up. Therefore, the petitioner being no more required by the police for the' investigation purposes is entitled to grant of post-arrest bail.

4. Learned DPG assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has opposed this bail petition contending that the petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. ascribed with specific role of enticing the complainant's mother and causing death of complainant's son and daughters.

5. Heard. Record perused.

6. The petitioner being a real nephew of complainant's wife used to visit complainant's house and on coming to know that the petitioner had developed illicit relations with Mst. Zulaikhan, daughter of the complainant, on his forbidden to the petitioner from coming his home, his relations became strained with his wife due to which the petitioner allegedly was able to entice Mst. Nooran and others to leave house of the complainant enabling him to get Mst. Zulaikhan divorced from Abdul Sattar (her husband) and then himself marry her. But during the investigation the statement made before the police by Mst. Nooran Bibi/wife of the complainant reveals that the petitioner wanted to marry Mst. Zulaikhan and for this purpose she along with her daughters was, prima facie, ready to accompany the petitioner. During the investigation Abdul Sattar, husband and father of Mst. Zulaikhan and Saima/ deceased respectively disclosed that neither the petitioner had illicit relations with his wife nor due to him (petitioner) his wife and daughter or others died rather the cause of their death was heavy pressure of water in the river. Similarly, Karam Illahi and Sheikh Muhammad real brothers of complainant's wife, Munawar Ali and others close relatives of complainant's wife as well as to the petitioner, corroborative each other saying that the petitioner was not the cause for death of complainant's daughters, son and grand-daughter but it was due to heavy pressure of water in the river. In this regard they sworn and submitted their affidavits during the investigation of the case. But the complainant did not come forward during investigation to get recorded his statement and remained obstinate to his stance taken in the F.I.R. However, during the investigation, the petitioner was declared innocent by the police and the challan submitted to the Court. Summing up the above discussion and keeping in view the non-joining of the complainant, the police investigation as well as the statement of Abdul Sattar, husband of Mst. Zulaikhan and father of Saima/deceased and other close relatives, this Court acceding it to be a fit case for one of further inquiry allows this petition and admits the petitioner to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.100,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./B-40/L Bail granted.