2005 PLP 1618(1) (YLR)
MUHAMMAD LATIF — Appellant Versus ASSISTANT MANAGER/SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OPERATION SUB-DIVISION LESCO (WAPDA) and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2005 PLP 1618(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Bashir A. Mujahid, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD LATIF — Appellant Versus ASSISTANT MANAGER/SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OPERATION SUB-DIVISION LESCO (WAPDA) and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Electricity Act (IX of 1910)-- |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1618(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Electricity Act (IX of 1910)-- as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1618(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Tassaduq Hussain Jillani and Bashir A. Mujahid, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1618(1) (YLR) (MUHAMMAD LATIF — Appellant Versus ASSISTANT MANAGER/SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OPERATION SUB-DIVISION LESCO (WAPDA) and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rao Javed-ul-Haq for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
S.24--Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S.3
Appellant had alleged that his electricity connection was disconnected without prior notice to him and that despite efforts being made, he had neither been issued detection bill nor any reason for said omission had been conveyed to him--High Court did not comment on the veracity of allegations levelled in appeal, but directed appellant to appear before the Authority along with a copy of appeal which would be treated by the Authority as an application/representation and would be decided within a week; in the meanwhile, subject to appellant's depositing reconnection charges and any other lawful dues which Authorities could intimate the appellant, electric connection of appellant would be restored within specified time.
Judgment & Decree
TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILANI, J.
Submits that the electricity connection of appellant's premises was disconnected without prior notice to the appellant on 17-5-2004 and despite efforts being made appellant has neither been issued any detection bill nor any reason for the afore- referred action has been conveyed to him.
2. We would not like to comment on the veracity of the allegations levelled in the appeal. Let appellant appear before respondent No.2 on any date in the current week along with' a copy of this appeal, which shall be treated as an application/representation and decided within a week. In the meanwhile and subject to appellant's depositing the reconnection charges and any other lawful dues which the respondent LESCO may intimate the appellant. The appellant's electricity connection shall be restored within 48 hours of the appearance before him. However, this would be without prejudice to any action, 'which the respondent LESCO may take and the remedies, which the appellant may pursue under the law. Disposed of. H.B.T./M-915/L Order accordingly.