YLR 2024

2024 PLP 161 (YLR)

REHMAT ULLAH — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2023-September-4
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2024 PLP 161 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties REHMAT ULLAH — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP 161 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP 161 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP 161 (YLR) (REHMAT ULLAH — Appellant Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Nadeem Shibli for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S.497

Punjab Food Authority Act (XVI of 2011), Ss.22-A, 23, 24, 27 & 28

Substandard and injurious food stuff

Bail, grant of

Case of further inquiry

Accused was arrested for allegedly selling substandard meat injurious to human consumption

Validity

Nature and degree of substandard meat and relevant standard, which was to be maintained by accused as shopkeeper, was not described anywhere

Accused placed in his file a certificate issued by Punjab Food Authority valid from 01.12.2022 to 30.11.2023

Date of occurrence was 05.07.2023 which was within the period stated in the certificate

Police file did not reflect any complaint lodged by any private person against accused for selling substandard meat

Out of 2500 Kgs. meat less than half was considered as harmful but question was on what grounds, the police investigation required further input

Report/Certificate of Veterinary Officer was not enclosed in police file

Offence did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.

Accused remained detained in judicial lockup for about two months

Bail was allowed in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

ALI BAQAR NAJAFI, J.

Petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case FIR No. 1153/2023, dated 05.07.2023 for offences under sections 22-A, 23, 24, 27, 28 of the Punjab Food Authority Act, 2011 registered at Police Station Thekri Wala, District Faisalabad on the allegation that a team of Food Safety Department along with Veterinary Officer, Dr. Abdul Jabbar, has raided the shop of the petitioner who upon inspection found 2500 KG of meat which was checked of which 1050 KG meat was found substandard and injurious to human consumption. It was further observed that at the stated place requisite steps for cleanliness and hygienic conditions to prevent insects were not made. Besides, there was no label or date on the meat, therefore, a call was made on 15 and the police was asked to arrest the petitioner, hence this FIR.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Prosecutor General and perusing the record it is straightaway observed that the petitioner was arrested on 05.07.2023 and was sent to judicial lockup on 06.07.2023. The police file further reveals that although a certificate/Order of voluntary withdrawal/destruction was issued by Muhammad Bilal Younas, Food Safety Officer, Punjab Food Authority, Faisalabad and the receipt of the said meat was prepared with reference to the certificate of Veterinary Officer namely, Dr. Abdul Jabbar but the file does not reflect any such certificate. Obviously, a certificate/report based on the positive evidence cannot be substituted for the naked eye of a common man. What was the nature of substandard meat and what was its degree and what was the relevant standard which was to be maintained by the petitioner as a shopkeeper is not described anywhere. The petitioner has placed in his file a certificate issued by the Punjab Food Authority valid from 01.12.2022 to 30.11.2023 and the date of occurrence i.e. 05.07.2023 is within the said period. The police file does not reflect any complaint lodged by a private person against the petitioner for selling of substandard meat. Surprisingly, out of 2500 KG meat less than half was considered as harmful but on which grounds the police investigation requires further input. According to the petitioner the raid was arranged by his opponents on the ground of professional rivalry. Learned Prosecutor has argued that FIR No.1537, under Learned Prosecutor has argued that FIR No.1537, under sections 22-A, 23, 24, 27 of Punjab Food Act, 2011, FIR No.386/12, under section 379, P.P.C., FIR No.453/14, under sections 2B, 3A, 269, 272, 373, P.P.C. and FIR No. 93 / 15 under sections 381-A, 411, P.P.C. were registered against the petitioner at Police Stations Ghulam Muhammad Abad and Thekriwala, District Faisalabad but the learned Prosecutor has not been able to place on record any conviction order in any of the said FIRs which means that criminal charges are still to be proved against the petitioner.

3. On the basis of tentative assessment and in view of the fact that report/certificate of the Veterinary Officer is not enclosed with the police file and the very fact that the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and the period of detention in judicial lockup exceeds about two months, I am inclined to allow this petition and grant post arrest bail to the petitioner subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. MH/R-14/l Bail allowed.