1988 PLP 631 (PLC(CS))
PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus SIRAJ DIN
| Citation | 1988 PLP 631 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus SIRAJ DIN |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 631 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 631 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 631 (PLC(CS)) (PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus SIRAJ DIN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Iqbal Khokhar for Appellant.
- S.M. Kaleem for Respondent
- Date of hearing: 5th April, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Ss.25‑A & 38(3)‑‑Grievance petition‑‑Service of grievance notice disputed‑‑Labour Court must record findings on point‑‑Order of Labour Court without recording such finding set aside by Appellate Tribunal and case remanded for re‑decision after recording findings on point of service of notice.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Iqbal Khokhar for Appellant. S.M. Kaleem for Respondent Date of hearing: 5th April, 1986. The decision dated 1‑10‑1985 recorded by the learned Labour Court No.l Lahore, has been challenged whereby the order of, retirement of the respondent was declared illegal holding that the age of superannuation was 60 years and was not 55 years.
2. The appeal succeeds on the short point that the learned lower Court has not recorded any finding on the point whether the grievance notice was or was not served by the respondent upon the appellant. In the written statement objection on the point was taken by the appellant. It was, therefore, necessary for the learned lower Court to record its finding on the point. As a result the appeal is accepted and setting aside the impugned decision the case is remanded with the direction that it be decided after recording finding on the point of service of grievance notice. The learned lower Court will be at liberty to allow additional evidence, if any party makes request and satisfies the Court on the point. A.E./83/Lb.P Case remanded