PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

ABDUL JABBAR Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 7622 of 1990, decided on 8th April, 1991.
Honorable Judges
Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J
Parties ABDUL JABBAR Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Tanvir Ahmad Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ABDUL JABBAR Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Muhammad Iqbal Chaudhry for Petitioner.
  • Rana Muhammad Arshad Khan, Addl. A.-G. for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199

Civil service

Civil servant working for the last more than four years on a post carrying BPS-17, while he was being paid emoluments for BPS 14 i.e. his own pay and scale

Validity

Civil servant's Constitutional petition was accepted to the extent that he should be paid for the post against which he had been working for such a long time

On the question of promotion /appointment of petitioner to BPS-17, matter being already pending before Public Service Commission, same was not pressed

Respondents were directed to pay petitioner's salary within specified period.

Judgment & Decree

PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Education and others Writ Petition No. 7622 of 1990, decided on 8th April, 1991.

Art. 199

Civil service

Civil servant working for the last more than four years on a post carrying BPS-17, while he was being paid emoluments for BPS 14 i.e. his own pay and scale

Validity

Civil servant's Constitutional petition was accepted to the extent that he should be paid for the post against which he had been working for such a long time

On the question of promotion /appointment of petitioner to BPS-17, matter being already pending before Public Service Commission, same was not pressed

Respondents were directed to pay petitioner's salary within specified period. Muhammad Iqbal Chaudhry for Petitioner. Rana Muhammad Arshad Khan, Addl. A.-G. for Respondents.