2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
AURANGZEB KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
| Citation | 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sh. Riaz Ahmed, C.J., Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ |
| Parties | AURANGZEB KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, C.J., Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (AURANGZEB KHAN Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, Deputy Attorney-General for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
SH. RIAZ AHMED, C.J.
Mr. Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, Deputy Attorney General informs that in the light of the direction of this Court matter for the promotion of Mr. Aurangzeb Khan was reconsidered and in pursuance of detailed deliberations of the Central Selection Board on 31-12-2001, his promotion was not recommended and thus petitioner was superseded. Reliance was placed on 2001 PLC 697 Rana Mahmood Hussain Officer Grade II Habib Bank Ltd. Sahiwal v. Chairman National Industrial Relations Commission camp at Lahore and 2 others to canvass that the authority deputed by law to perform certain action must do the same honestly and fairly. There is no cavil with this proposition. Suffice it to add that the matter has been reconsidered and as far as jurisdiction of the Tribunal and this Court is concerned, the same is limited and we cannot go into the question regarding fitness or otherwise of a Government employee. Hence, no case for interference is made out. Dismissed accordingly. M.H./A-303/S Petition dismissed.