1989 PLP 881 (PLC(CS))
ASHFAQ AHMED BA.1WA Versus UNITED BANK LTD., KARACHI and 2 others
| Citation | 1989 PLP 881 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor khan Lodhi. |
| Parties | ASHFAQ AHMED BA.1WA Versus UNITED BANK LTD., KARACHI and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance !XXII1 of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 881 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance !XXII1 of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 881 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor khan Lodhi..
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 881 (PLC(CS)) (ASHFAQ AHMED BA.1WA Versus UNITED BANK LTD., KARACHI and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- H.R. Haider for Petitioner.
- M.S. Bokhari for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 20th December, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Ss. 37 & 38‑‑Review‑‑Tribunal has no powers of review‑‑Appellate Tribunal decided appeal of Bank employee on ground that Labour Court and Tribunal had no jurisdiction‑‑Re‑hearing of appeal sought on ground that Supreme Court on the basis of a rule laid down had held that Labour Courts had jurisdiction‑‑Re hearing refused by Tribunal on the ground that Tribunal could not review its own order.
Judgment & Decree
Miscellaneous Application No. LHR‑593 of 1987, decided on 20th December, 1987. ‑‑‑Ss. 37 & 38‑‑Review‑‑Tribunal has no powers of review‑‑Appellate Tribunal decided appeal of Bank employee on ground that Labour Court and Tribunal had no jurisdiction‑‑Re‑hearing of appeal sought on ground that Supreme Court on the basis of a rule laid down had held that Labour Courts had jurisdiction‑‑Re hearing refused by Tribunal on the ground that Tribunal could not review its own order. H.R. Haider for Petitioner. M.S. Bokhari for Respondents. Date of hearing: 20th December, 1987. This is a miscellaneous application for re‑hearing of the appeals, one brought by the bank and the other by the petitioner. The learned lower Court had directed the reinstatement of the petitioner without back benefits. The Bank challenged the order of reinstatement whereas the petitioner brought appeal for back benefits. Following 1985 P L C 1053 it was held by this Tribunal vide decision dated 26‑5‑1986 that Labour Courts and this Tribunal had no jurisdiction. The ruling referred to above, was of the High Court and was challenged before the Supreme Court in some cases. The Supreme Court has now held that the Labour Courts have jurisdiction in Banks' cases. For this reason the petitioner has applied for the rehearing of the appeal. Since this Tribunal has no powers of review, the order dated 26‑5‑1986 cannot be set aside or reversed. Till the said order stands, I am not in a position to take up the matter again. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance petition returned to the petitioner vide order dated 26‑5‑1980 of this Tribunal was presented to the National Industrial Relations Commission (N.1.R.C.) and from there it has been returned to him on account of the finding given by the Supreme Court in other cases. May it be so but the position is the same, that this Court cannot review its own order.
2. As a result the miscellaneous application is dismissed. A.E./484/Lb. P Application dismissed.