2021 PLP 3 (YLRN)
BAWAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2021 PLP 3 (YLRN) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | Ikramullah Khan, J |
| Parties | BAWAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP 3 (YLRN)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP 3 (YLRN)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Ikramullah Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP 3 (YLRN) (BAWAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Abdul Fayaz for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 148, 149, 427 & 109
Qatl-i-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapon, mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees, abetment
Medical grounds and accused being infirm
Scope
Accused along with others was charged for effective firing upon the brother and father of complainant which resulted in their death
Accused sought bail on medical grounds and on the ground of being infirm
Ground of infirmity had already been taken by accused in his earlier bail application, which was dismissed by the High Court
So far as bail on the medical ground was concerned, Standing Medical Board after examination of accused had found that treatment of accused could be carried out in the jail premises, so when there was no threat to his life in jail and proper treatment was available to him in jail premises then he could not be granted bail on medical ground
Petition for grant of bail was dismissed, in circumstances. Shabbir Hussain Gigyani for the Complainant. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
IKRAMULLAH KHAN, J.
Through the instant bail petition, petitioner Bawar Khan seeks his release on bail in case FIR No. 1318 dated 10.12.2018, registered under sections 302/ 148/149/427/109, P.P.C., at Police Station Jabbar, District Mardan, on fresh ground of medical and infirmity till final decision of the case.
2. As per prosecution case, petitioner along with co-accused Kishwar, Jamshed and Ali Bahadar were charged by complainant Akhtar Hameed for effective firing at his father Noor Hameed and brother Khalid Hameed, who were on motorcycle ahead of complainant and PW. Tariq Hameed, coming to their village, as a result of which they were hit and died on the spot. Consequently, on the report of complainant present case was registered against all the accused.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the available record.
4. Perusal of record reveals that the prayer of petitioner for bail on merit has already been dismissed up to this Court who has now approached this Court on fresh ground of medical and infirmity for his release on bail.
5. So far as the ground of infirmity taken by learned defence counsel is concerned, admittedly this ground was taken by petitioner in his previous bail petition (Cr. M.B.A. No. 1491-P/2019) before this Court, which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 24.6.2019, so the petitioner cannot take this plea again which has already been refused by this Court.
6. Now coming to the other ground (medical) on which the petitioner has prayed for his release on bail, as per record, on the application of petitioner submitted before the learned trial Court, he was referred to the Standing Medical Board, who after examination of the petitioner, opined that the treatment of petitioner can be carried out in the jail premises, so when there is no threat to his life in jail and proper treatment is available to him in jail premises, then he cannot be granted bail on medical ground. Moreover, the petitioner has availed all the grounds including merit, medical and infirmity, which were declined upto this Court therefore, no good fresh ground is available to the petitioner which could be made a ground for his release on bail. Besides, trial of petitioner has commenced and numerous witnesses have been examined while a few witnesses are yet to be examined but the case is lingering on due to numerous bail applications submitted by petitioner and co-accused in different Courts on one pretext or other, which caused delay in conclusion of trial. Consequently, this bail petition on the plea of infirmity and medical ground is dismissed. However, the learned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously by treating it as a target case on day to day basis and no unnecessary adjournment should be granted. The prosecution/ complainant is directed to produce its remaining witnesses and petitioner is also directed to ensure attendance of his counsel before the learned trial Court for cross-examination of the witnesses so that the trial could be concluded expeditiously. SA/265/P Bail declined.