1986 PLP 41 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus AZIZUL QADIR and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 41 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rehman, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus AZIZUL QADIR and others‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 41 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 41 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rehman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 41 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus AZIZUL QADIR and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan Advocate Supreme Court and S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate‑on Record for Petitioner:.
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate:‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.13‑‑Ejectment‑‑Tenant not pressing petition on merits but only seeking some time to vacate house in question‑‑Landlord agreeing to give four months' time on condition of payment of four months' rent in advance to which tenant agreeing‑‑Order accordingly. Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan Advocate Supreme Court and S. Wajid Hussain, Advocate‑on Record for Petitioner:. Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate:‑on‑Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd April 1985. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑The petitioner has filed the present petition for leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court dated 25‑9‑1984, dismissing his writ petition in a rent case.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition on merits but only seeks some time to vacate the house in question. The learned counsel for the respondents‑landlord is present and agrees to give him four months' time to vacate the house on the condition that shall give vacant possession thereof to the landlord on 1‑9‑1985 and that he shall pay rent for this period to the respondents each month in advance, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner agrees.
3. In this view of the matter, we grant four months time to the petitioner to vacate the premises in question, on the aforementioned conditions. The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. M. Y. H. Leave refused.