2008 PLP 1560 (YLR)
SHAHID HUSSAIN and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 PLP 1560 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari and Mrs. Yasmin Abbassey, JJ |
| Parties | SHAHID HUSSAIN and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 1560 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 1560 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari and Mrs. Yasmin Abbassey, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 1560 (YLR) (SHAHID HUSSAIN and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9
Prosecution story, revealed that accused, duly armed with weapons, had fired at the Excise Officials to cause their murder, but no such case was registered by the Excise Officials at any Police Station
Authority of Excise Officials to secure the licensed weapons of accused persons required to be legally examined
Inspite of the fact that the Excise Officials had prior information, they did not make any effort to associate a public witness to witness the recovery and seizure, of narcotic substance coupled with the fact that alleged recovery was effected at 5-00 p.m. and that too at the Bus Stand where the passengers were found available all the time
In view of the pendency of a murder case filed by one of accused persons against the Excise Officials, the possibility of registration of a false case in retaliation could not be ruled out
Case of accused persons, in given circumstances called for further inquiry entitling them to the concession of bail
Accused were admitted to bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Sharif Siyal for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J.
Granted.
2. The applicants are alleged to have been found in possession of 11 Kgs. Charas while boarding a car, which was intercepted on the basis of spy information by Excise Inspector Zulifqar Ali Shaikh along with his staff near bus stand Shalimar Coach Sakrand. It is further alleged that besides possessing the narcotic, the applicants being armed with pistols, used criminal force to deter the Excise Police from performing their official duties and also made attempt on their lives. Thus the Excise Police seized the arms and ammunition from their possession. The applicants are therefore, seeking bail. It is contended on behalf of the applicants that they have been falsely implicated in the case on account of enmity with the Excise Police, as certain officers of Excise Department have been charged for murder of uncle of applicant/accused Shahid Hussain. The car, which was boarded by the applicants and was allegedly secured by the Excise Police met with an accident on the said date and time and that there was interpolation in the mashirnama of arrest and recoveries. Learned State counsel has not been able to controvert the pleas raised on behalf of the applicants and had to concede that the case of the applicants calls for further inquiry. The arguments addressed at the bar have been considered and the material placed on the record has been perused. According to the prosecution story, applicants were duly armed with weapons and fired at the Excise Officials to cause their murder but no such case was registered by the Excise Officials at any Police Station. Similarly no case was registered against the applicants at any police station for assaulting the public servants to deter them from discharge of their officials duties. The authority of Excise Officials to secure the licensed weapons of the applicants required to be legally examined. Inspite of the fact that the Excise Officials had prior information, yet, they did not make any effort to associate a public witness to witness the recovery and seizure, coupled with the fact that the alleged recovery was effected at 5-00 p.m. and that too at the Bus stand where the passengers are found available all the time. In view of the pendency of a murder case filed by applicant Shahid Hussain against the Excise Officials, the possibility of registration of a false case in retaliation could not be ruled out. A certified true copy of the Mashirnama of arrest and recovery, which is placed on record, contains cuttings, which are noticeable by naked eye. In the given circumstances, the case of the applicants calls for further inquiry, thus, entitling them to the concession of bail. Accordingly, the applicants are granted bail, subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one Lac) each and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./S-26/L Bail granted.