1992 PLP 2078 (MLD)
GHULAM QADIR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus QAIM BAKHSH through Legal Heirs and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1992 PLP 2078 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Board of Revenue Punjab |
| Bench Members | Hafizullah Ishaq, Member (Consolidation) |
| Parties | GHULAM QADIR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus QAIM BAKHSH through Legal Heirs and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance (VI of 1960)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 2078 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance (VI of 1960)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 2078 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Board of Revenue Punjab bench comprising: Hafizullah Ishaq, Member (Consolidation).
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 2078 (MLD) (GHULAM QADIR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus QAIM BAKHSH through Legal Heirs and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Iftikhar Hussain Khera for Petitioners (in both Revision Petitions).
- Sardar Mehmood Iqbal Khakwani for Petitioner (in R.O.R.No.272 of 1988).
- Date of hearing: 9th July, 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 13‑‑‑Consolidation scheme‑‑‑Additional Commissioner's order whereby consolidation scheme was amended showed that not only number of plots were increased by his order but same were also scattered, which was offensive to the principles of consolidation‑‑‑Order in question, therefore, besides being apparently motivated, had failed to meet the objectives of consolidation and thus, could not be sustained‑‑‑Case was remanded to Additional Commissioner for fresh decision after hearing the parties and in accordance with the law and instructions on the subject.
Judgment & Decree
Pre‑ Cons. ‑ Post Cons. After amendment. (1) Ghulam Qadir etc. Scheme No.224. 11 5 8 (2) Qaim Bakhsh, Scheme No.263 15 25 31 (3) Muhammad Yousaf, Scheme No.239 7 13 15 A perusal of the sketch map shows that not only the number of plots has increased but these have also been scattered which is offensive to the principles of consolidation. Thus the impugned order, besides being apparently motivated, has failed to meet the objectives of consolidation and hence cannot be sustained. The revision petitions, therefore, succeed; the impugned order are set aside and the cases are remanded to. the Additional Commissioner (Cons:), Bahawalpur Division for fresh decision after hearing the parties and in accordance with the law and instructions on the subject.
7. The orders were reserved for examination of the record and shall now be communicated to the parties. A.A./443/R Revision accepted.