YLR 2008

2008 PLP 2280 (YLR)

ANJUM JILLANI — Petitioner Versus Mst. FEROZA JILLANI and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Peshawar
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous Quashment No. 43 of 2008 in Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2007, decided on 23rd June, 2008.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Alam Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 PLP 2280 (YLR)
Forum / Court Peshawar
Bench Members Muhammad Alam Khan, J
Parties ANJUM JILLANI — Petitioner Versus Mst. FEROZA JILLANI and another — Respondents
Primary Law (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 2280 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 2280 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Muhammad Alam Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 2280 (YLR) (ANJUM JILLANI — Petitioner Versus Mst. FEROZA JILLANI and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) (b) Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 381-A

Illegal Dispossession Act (XI of 2005), Ss.3/4

Extending concession of bail

Under provisions of S.381-A, Cr. P. C., when a person was convicted and sentenced to less than one year imprisonment, accused could be extended the concession of bail in order to enable him to file an appeal in the apex Court

In the present case sentence awarded to accused was one year and he had no vested right of appeal in the apex Court

Accused, however would have to seek the leave of the apex Court by filing criminal petition for special leave to appeal, which did not include the right of appeal as used in S.381-A, Cr.P.C.

Accused could not be released on bail. Muhammad Bashir and 3 others v. The State and another 1994 PCr.LJ 1552 rel.

Ss.3/4

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 561-A

Compromise

Acquittal of accused

Matter was between the mother and son

Complainant appeared before the court and submitted a compromise, their joint statement was recorded and complainant had forgiven accused in the name of Allah Almighty, subject to the terms and conditions that neither accused nor his wife, brother and uncle would have any concern with the complainant and they would not interfere in her possession and the complainant would have a right of free access to her house and living peacefully there

Similar statement of accused was-recorded after his release from jail

Accused was acquitted and ordered to be released. Shaukat Hayat Khan Khakwani and Muhammad Ismail Khan Alizai for the Petitioner. Mst. Feroza Jillani Complainant in person. Farooq Akhtar for the State. Probation Officer, D.I. Khan in person.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD ALAM KHAN, J.

This order will dispose of two applications i.e. Criminal Miscellaneous No.117 of 2008 and Cr. MQ No.43 of 2008 as both arise out of the same matter and involve a common question of law and facts.

2. Briefly narrated, the facts of the case are that Mst. Feroza Jillani filed a complaint under section 3/4 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005. After the trial the convict-petitioner Anjum Jillani was sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.3000 or id default of payment of fine, to further three months simple imprisonment. He was however, placed at the disposal of the Prohibition Officer and this Court vide order dated 10-6-2008 dismissed Criminal Appeal No.29 of 2007 and set aside the probation order. Later on, the convict-petitioner submitted an application bearing Criminal Miscellaneous No.117 of 2008 which came up for hearing before this Court on 17-6-2008. In that application it was argued that as the convict was on probation, so, he had completed the probation period and had deposited the fine and so, this Court, in view of those submissions, passed an order that as the convict has completed the probation period, he be released forthwith from Jail. The warrant of release sent by this Court, was returned with an endorsement dated 18-6-2008 that neither the convict has surrendered before the Probation Officer nor he has undergone even one day sentence in Jail, so, the Superintendent Jail sought the clarification of the release order from the office.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the provisions of section 381-A, Cr.P.C. when a person is convicted to imprisonment less than on year and he had a right of appeal in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, this Court, even after dismissal of appeal, can release him on bail. When asked, that whether the convict had a right of appeal in the Supreme Court or he will have to file a criminal petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court, the learned counsel could not convince this Court.

4. It is true that under section 381-A, Cr.P.C. when a person is convicted and sentenced to less than one year imprisonment, the convict can be extended the concession of bail in order to enable him to file an appeal in the apex Court.

5. In this case the sentence awarded to the appellant is one year and he has no vested right of appeal in the apex Court. However, he will have to seek the leave of the apex Court by filing criminal petition for special leave to appeal, which does not include the right of appeal as used in section 381-A, Cr.P.C. in view of the dictum rendered in the case of Muhammad Bashir and 3 others. v. The State and another (1994 PCr.LJ 1552) and thus the convict cannot be released on bail.

6. Confronted with this situation, the parties requested for effecting compromise. Resultantly, as the matter was between the mother and son, Mst. Feroza Jillani being mother and Anjum Jillani being her step son. Mst. Feroza Jillani along with Mst. Zeenat Tabassum appeared before this Court and submitted a compromise. Their joint statement was recorded and placed on file. Mst. Feroza Jillani has forgiven the convict in the name of Allah Almighty subject to the terms and conditions that neither the convict nor his wife Mst. Zeenat Tabassum or her brothers, nor Malik Zulfiqar, uncle of the convict-appellant, will have any concern with Mst. Feroza Jillani. They will not interfere in her possession and she will have a right of free access to her house and living peacefully there. Similar statement of Anjum Jillani was recorded on 27-6-2008, after his release from Jail.

7. Thus, in view of compromise, I accept Cr.MQ No.43 of 2008 and set-aside the order of this Court dated 10-6-2008 in Criminal Appeal No.29 of 2007 under section 561-A, Cr.P.C. and acquit the convict-petitioner namely Anjum Jillani son of Malik Ghulam Jillani, resident of Gatti Bagh Wali, Anjum House, outside Leghari Gate, Dera Ismail Khan. He has been presently lodged in Central Jail, Dera Ismail Khan. The office is directed to issue warrant of his release and Superintendent, Central Prison, Dera Ismail Khan is directed to release the convict forthwith if not required in any other case.

8. Above are the reasons of my short order of even date. H.B.T./93/P Order accordingly.