PLD 2012

P L D 2012 Supreme Court 1086 (PLP)

Criminal Original Petition No.74 of 2012 in Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2010

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
2012-October-10
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 2012 Supreme Court 1086 (PLP)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members N/A
Parties Criminal Original Petition No.74 of 2012 in Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2010
Primary Law Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 2012 Supreme Court 1086 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 2012 Supreme Court 1086 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 2012 Supreme Court 1086 (PLP) (Criminal Original Petition No.74 of 2012 in Suo Motu Case No.4 of 2010). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003)

Representation

  • Farooq H.Naek, Federal Minister for Law and Justice for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 3

Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 204

Contempt proceedings against Prime Minister/Chief Executive of the Federation for non-implementation of directions given by the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Mobashir Hassan v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2010 SC 265), regarding writing of a letter to authorities in Switzerland to seek revival of requests for mutual legal assistance and to secure the status of civil party and the claims lodged to the allegedly laundered money lying in Switzerland

Draft of the communication (letter) to be addressed and dispatched to the concerned authorities in Switzerland in compliance of the directions of the Supreme Court presented in the Court

Supreme Court observed that the draft communication (letter) presented before it conformed to the requirements of said directions and it also addressed the relevant concerns voiced by the Prime Minister before the Supreme Court

Supreme Court directed that the draft communication (letter) should be dispatched and delivered to the concerned authorities in Switzerland within a period of four weeks and proof of actual receipt of the communication by concerned authorities in Switzerland should be produced before the Court; that Minister for Law and Justice should place on the record of present case a copy of the relevant summary for the Prime Minister, a copy of the Prime Minister's order regarding authorization, a copy of the authorization and a copy of the actual letter/communication (with its diary number, date and signatures) dispatched to Switzerland.

Judgment & Decree

ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, J.

As directed by this Court on 18-9-2012 and as instructed and authorized by the Prime Minister of Pakistan in that respect on the said date Mr. Farooq H. Naek, Federal Minister for Law and Justice, had produced before us on 25-9-2012 the required authorization mentioned in the order dated 18-9-2012 and a draft of the communication to be addressed and dispatched by the Government of Pakistan to the Attorney-General, Geneva, Switzerland in compliance of the direction contained in Paragraph No.178 of the judgment handed by this Court in the case of Dr. Mubashir Hassan v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2010 SC

265. We had perused the draft communication on that day and had required Mr. Naek to improve the same so as to meet the requirement of Paragraph No.178 of the above mentioned judgment and the hearing of the matter was adjourned at his request to 26-9-2012. He had then produced an altered draft of the communication on 26-9-2012 and after perusal and consideration of the same we had found the same to be still deficient upon which he had sought time till 5-10-2012 to improve the draft further so as to meet the requisite requirements. Some aspects of the draft produced by Mr. Naek on 5-10-2012 also needed to be attended to and, thus, the matter was adjourned at his request till today. Mr. Naek has produced an amended draft before us today which is reproduced below: "Attorney General Islamabad October, 2012 Geneva, Switzerland Re: PP/11105/1997 and CP 289/97 Dear Sir, This is with reference to the letter dated 22nd May, 2008 addressed by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, the then Attorney General of Pakistan to Mr.Daniel Zappelli, Attorney General Geneva, Switzerland. In view of the directions given by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Paragraph 178 (copy attached as Annex-I) of its Judgment dated 16th December 2009 in the case of Dr. Mobashir Hasan, reported as PLD 2010 SC 265, the aforesaid letter is hereby withdrawn and may be treated as never written and therefore revival of requests, status and claims, is sought. This is without prejudice to the legal rights and defences of the Presidents/Heads of State which may be available under the law, constitution and international law. Yours sincerely Justice (R) Yasmin Abbasey, Secretary" We find that the proposed communication conforms to the requirements of Paragraph No.178 of the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of Dr. Mubashir Hassan and it also addressed the relevant concerns of the Government of Pakistan voiced before this Court by the Prime Minister on 18-9-2012.

2. Mr. Naek has informed us that the relevant communication shall be dispatched to Switzerland through the Foreign Office and the same shall be delivered to the Attorney-General Geneva, Switzerland by the Ambassador of Pakistan in Switzerland or his representative and the process is likely to take about four weeks. Let the needful be done by the Government of Pakistan within a period of four weeks from today and proof of actual receipt of the said communication by the Attorney-General, Geneva, Switzerland be produced before the Court on the next date of hearing. In the meanwhile Mr. Naek shall place on the record of this case a copy of the relevant summary for the Prime Minister, a copy of the Prime Minister's order regarding authorization, a copy of the authorization and a copy of the actual letter/communication (with its diary number, date and signatures) dispatched to Switzerland.

3. Adjourned to 14-11-2012. MWA/S-22/S Order accordingl