PLD 1956

P L D 1956 (W (PLP)

THE MULTAN TRANSPORT Co., LTD., MULTAN‑Appellant Versus MALIK BUS SERVICE, MULTAN & R. T. A., MULTAN‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
17th January 1956, from the, decree of R. T. A., Multan, dated 23rd July 1955
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1956 (W (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties THE MULTAN TRANSPORT Co., LTD., MULTAN‑Appellant Versus MALIK BUS SERVICE, MULTAN & R. T. A., MULTAN‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1956 (W (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1956 (W (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1956 (W (PLP) (THE MULTAN TRANSPORT Co., LTD., MULTAN‑Appellant Versus MALIK BUS SERVICE, MULTAN & R. T. A., MULTAN‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Sh. Bashir Ahmad for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 57 (3)‑No order should be passed until statutory period has expired.

Judgment & Decree

NASIR AHMAD.‑This is an appeal against the order of the R. T. A., Multan passed in their meeting held on 23rd July 1955, by which two permits were granted to the respondent companyMalik Bus Service‑to ply between Multan and Nawab Pur. The main ground urged in the appeal is that the application was published on 6th July and the grant was made on the 23rd and 24th July i.e., before the lapse of the statutory period of thirty days as laid down in section 57 (3) of the Act. On going through the record of the R. T. A. the application was found undated and without any endorsement to the effect that it had been published. The R. T. A. should really have been more careful in complying with the provisions of law. I would accordingly accept this appeal and direct that the matter be reconsider after complying with the legal provisions regarding publishing and hearing of objections and a fresh decision then taken or merits. Announced. K. M. A.