2012 P Cr (PLP)
MANZOOR AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2012 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MANZOOR AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 P Cr (PLP) (MANZOOR AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Barrister Danyal Ijaz for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302/109/34
Qatl-e-amd, abetment, common intention
Contentions of the accused were that his appeal had not reached its logical end despite a lapse of more than two years; that the accused had not made any contribution towards such delay in disposal of his appeal, and that the accused was a previous non-convict and had no history of involvement in cases similar to the present case, therefore, he could not be deemed to be a desperate or hardened criminal
Appeal filed by the accused had not been decided despite a lapse of more than two years and the accused was not responsible for such delay
Accused was neither a desperate nor a hardened criminal
No material was available to withhold the concession of bail available to the accused on statutory grounds under S.426, Cr.P.C.
Petition of accused for suspension of sentence was accepted and he was released on bail.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1 of 2009 The petitioner seeks his release on bail through suspension of sentence of imprisonment for life awarded to him vide judgment dated 17-7-2009 passed by the learned ASJ, Phalia, District Mandi Baha-ud-Din, in case F.I.R. No.173 of 2004 dated 14-5-2004 Police Station Pharianwali, District Mandi Baha ud-Din, under sections 302/109/34, P.P.C.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner preferred the instant appeal on 18-8-2009 and which has yet not reached its logical end although the petitioner has not made any contribution towards the delay in disposal of the same; that the petitioner is a non-convict previously and that he does not bear history of involvement in such cases in the past so cannot be deemed to be desperate or hardened criminal.
3. Learned DPG has vehemently opposed the petition. It is contended that the petitioner and his co-accused took life of an innocent person and that the initial presumption of innocence in his favour has evaporated due to judgment of the learned ASJ. It is, however, admitted that he is non-convict previously and does not bear history of involvement in such cases.
4. It is evident from the record that the appeal filed on 18-8-2009 has not been decided so far and that the petitioner is not responsible for this delay, which is natural result of the fact that the Court is over-burdended. The petitioner is neither a desperate nor hardened criminal. No ground is available to withhold the concession of bail admissible on statutory ground, under section 426, Cr.P.C. as amended through Act No.VIII of 2011.
5. For the reasons supra, the petition is accepted and the sentence of the petitioner is suspended. He be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.500,000 (Rupees five lacs) only with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. He is directed to remain in attendance on each and every date of hearing till the disposal of the main appeal. M.W.A./M-193/L Petition allowed.