2006 PLP 1487 (SCMR)
IQBAL PAHORE — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chief Election Commissioner and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1487 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Hamid Ali Mirza and Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, JJ |
| Parties | IQBAL PAHORE — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chief Election Commissioner and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XXVII of 2001) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1487 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XXVII of 2001) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1487 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Hamid Ali Mirza and Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1487 (SCMR) (IQBAL PAHORE — Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chief Election Commissioner and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shahadat Awan, Advocate Supreme Court and Suleman Habibullah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 20th July, 2004.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 25-3-2004 in C.P. No.D-346 of 2003 passed by the High Court of Sindh Hyderabad Circuit).
S. 148
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)
Out of total 231 eligible voters, seven seats were vacant at the time of election of Nazim of Union Council
Returned candidate secured 114 votes and was declared as Nazim of Union Council
Contention of the petitioners was that 50% of the total number of votes had not been secured by the returned candidate
Out of total 231 voters seven voters/members were not there to cast their votes and there remained only 224 voters to cast their votes
High Court rightly concluded that out of 224 valid eligible votes, the successful candidate would have to secure fifty per cent. of the same in order to succeed
Returned candidate had secured 114 votes out of 224, therefore, the same being more than fifty per cent. was rightly declared successful as Nazim of Union Council
Supreme Court did not take any exception to the finding of High Court and did not find any legal or factual infirmity with the judgment
Leave to appeal was refused.
Judgment & Decree
HAMID ALI MIRZA, J.
This civil petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment, dated 20-4-2004 in Constitutional Petition No.D-346 of 2003 passed by learned Division Bench of the High Court of Sindh Hyderabad Circuit, whereby the said Constitutional petition was dismissed maintaining the decision, dated 8-11-2001 of Member Election Commission of Pakistan, whereby the respondent was declared as Nazim of Taluka Hyderabad.
2. Facts of the case need not be reiterated as the same have been stated in the memo. of petition and the impugned judgment.
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in fact there are 231 voters in the said Union Council of Taluka Hyderabad therefore the successful candidate has to secure fifty per cent of the total number of votes of the union councils in order to succeed but the respondent having secured only 114 votes of the total votes therefore some being less than fifty per cent is not entitled to succeed consequently, the order passed by learned Member Election Commission of Pakistan and maintained by the High Court cannot be sustained.
4. We do not find substance and merit in the said contention.
5. It is admitted position that on the date of election there were 224 eligible voters as one seat of the said union. council was lying vacant from the very beginning, four vacancies occurred on account of their death, one voter/member's seat was vacated as he was elevated as Member of Taluka Council while one voter/member has resigned as he has joined service, thereby out of total 231 voters seven voters/members were not there to cast their votes in view of above stated circumstances and the facts, consequently there remained only 224 voters to cast their votes. Learned High Court, after considering the relevant provisions of law rightly came to the conclusion that out of 224 valid eligible votes, A the successful candidate will have to secure fifty per cent of the same in order to succeed. In the instant case also the respondent has secured 114 votes out of 224, therefore, the same being more than fifty per cent was rightly declared successful as Nazim of the said Union Council. Learned Division Bench of the High Court in the concluding para at page 34 of the judgment has observed:
"For the foregoing reasons we are of the considered opinion that the respondent No.4 secured more than 50- per. cent of the total votes of the members of the Union Councils in Taluka Hyderabad and was thus rightly declared as elected candidate for the post of Taluka Nazim Hyderabad. The learned Member Election Commission of Pakistan has rightly held that the 7 vacant seats could not be included in the Electoral College and that the respondent No.4 has secured more than 50 per cent of the votes of the members of the Electoral College/Union Councils. The notification issued by the Election Commission of Pakistan, dated 13-11-2003 notifying the respondent No.4 as Taluka Nazim Hyderabad is not open to any exception. The petition is without substance which stands dismissed accordingly."
6. No exception could be taken to the finding of the learned Division Bench of the High Court and we do not find any legal or factual infirmity with the impugned judgment, therefore no case for leave to appeal is made out, hence the same is declined and petition is dismissed. M.H./I-92/SC????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Petition dismissed.