P L D 1957 W (PLP)
Malik GHULAM SARWAR‑Petitioner Versus GHULZAR and others‑Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1957 W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | H. A. Majid, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan |
| Parties | Malik GHULAM SARWAR‑Petitioner Versus GHULZAR and others‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Tenancy (Amendment) Act (VII of 1952) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1957 W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Tenancy (Amendment) Act (VII of 1952) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1957 W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: H. A. Majid, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1957 W (PLP) (Malik GHULAM SARWAR‑Petitioner Versus GHULZAR and others‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. A.Zaidi for petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Judgment & Decree
H. A. MAJID.‑
I need not go into the matters which have been considered by the lower Revenue Courts, because I find that the amendment of the Punjab Tenancy Act made in 1952 (Act VII of 1952) struck a fatal blow to this litigation. The petitioner's suit for the dispossession of the respondents had been instituted in 1949. It was pending at the time when the said amending Act was passed. This new legislation converted the occupancy tenants into shareholders in the land forming the tenancy. The suit by the original landlord for the ejectment of the tenants, therefore, become infructuous ipso facto. The suit was dismissed by Assistant Collector on some other grounds. The Collector dismissed the petitioner's appeal. The Commissioner dismissed the petition for revision. The second petition for revision is accordingly dismissed. The petitioner should seek a partition of the total holding if he is anxious to obtain possession of any particular plot. K. M. A. Petition dismissed.