PLC(CS) 1978

1978 P (PLP)

SAEED MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus UNIVERSITY OF BALUCHISTAN AND 4 OTHERS

Jurisdiction / Court
Baluchistan
Decided Date
Appeal No. 20 of 1977, decided on 5th February 1973.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1978 P (PLP)
Forum / Court Baluchistan
Bench Members N/A
Parties SAEED MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus UNIVERSITY OF BALUCHISTAN AND 4 OTHERS
Primary Law University of Baluchistan Ordinance (I of 1970)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1978 P (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: University of Baluchistan Ordinance (I of 1970)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1978 P (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Baluchistan bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1978 P (PLP) (SAEED MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus UNIVERSITY OF BALUCHISTAN AND 4 OTHERS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

University of Baluchistan Ordinance (I of 1970)‑

Representation

  • Jamil Khan Sherwani for Appellant.
  • Muhammad Khan Raisani for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ S. 3(3)‑Baluchistan Service Tribunals Act (V of 1974), S. 2(a) Baluchistan Civil Servants Act (IX of 1974), S. 3‑Jurisdiction‑ Employee3 of Baluchistan University‑Persons engaged In connection with affairs of Province of Baluchistan, hence, civil servants‑Service Tribunal, held, possessed of jurisdiction to entertain appeals in respect of matters relating to terms and conditions of employees of Baluchistan University. BLD 1965 SC 90 ref.

Judgment & Decree

FAKHRUDDIN H. SHAIKH (CHAIRMAN).‑

Heard Mr. Jamil Khan Sherwani for the appellant and Mohammad Raisani, for the respondents on the preliminary objection that a University Employee is not a civil servant sad as such the appeal is not maintainable. Subsection (3) of section 3 of the Baluchistan University Ordinance, 1972 provides that the University shall be a body corporate. Such body has been held by the Supreme Court in P L D 1965 S C 90 as statutory body constituted by the Government In connection with the affairs of the Province. This would naturally imply that an employee of the University is a person) engaged in connection with the affairs of the Province. He will therefor fall within the definition of a "civil servant" as provided in section 2(a) of the Baluchistan Civil Services Tribunal Act. The Tribunal has jurisdiction) to entertain appeals in respect of all matters relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants of the Province under section 3 of the Baluchistan Civil Servants Act. We are therefore of the view that this Tribunal has jurisdic tion to entertain this appeal as it has been filed by a civil servant. The preliminary objection is therefore disallowed. Objection overruled.