SCMR 1987

1987 PLP 1435 (SCMR)

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALPUR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 461 of 1980, decided on 28th April, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Nasim Hasan Shah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 1435 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Nasim Hasan Shah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALPUR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1435 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1435 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1435 (SCMR) (SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALPUR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

Representation

  • Tanvir Ahmad Khan, Assistant Advocate‑General for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 28th April, 1987.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the order of the Punjab Service Tribunal, dated 18‑9‑1979 in Case No. 116/233 of 1978). ‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Police constable penalised for negligence‑‑Punishment enhanced by Deputy Inspector‑General and constable dismissed from service‑‑Order of dismissal set aside by Service Tribunal as having been passed without jurisdiction‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider contention that respondent, after joining police force of new province, had in preference to rules in force in Bahawalpur State voluntarily adopted rules applicable in old Province of Punjab and under those rules Deputy Inspector‑General of Police had power to enhance punishment awarded to Police Officer by a lower authority.

Judgment & Decree

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑ This is a petition for special leave to appeal from the order dated 18‑9‑ 1979 of the Punjab Service Tribunal whereby the order dismissing the respondent from service was set aside.

2. The respondent joined service in the police force of the Old Bahawalpur State. On the creation of the Province of West Pakistan he became a member of the police force of the new Province. On 13‑11‑1968 he alongwith three other constables was detailed to look after the railway bridge at Adamwan. A senior police officer made a surprise check and found that the respondent and the other constables were absent and their arms were lying unguarded. Consequently, disciplinary proceedings were taken against him and the other constables. After an inquiry the Superintendent of Police, Bahawalpur directed that his ten years service be forfeited and his pay be reduced. One of the other constables who was similarly punished preferred an appeal before the Deputy Inspector General of Police who suo motu issued a notice to the respondent why his punishment should not be enhanced. After giving him an opportunity of being heard he dismissed the respondent from service. The respondent filed a mercy petition before the Inspector‑General of Police but without any success. He then lodged an appeal with the Punjab Service Tribunal.

3. The Punjab Service Tribunal held that the respondent was governed by the police rules which were in force in the old Bahawalpur State and under those rules there was no provision whereby the Deputy Inspector General could enhance the punishment imposed upon a police officer by a lower authority. Accordingly, it accepted the appeal, set aside the order of the Deputy Inspector General and restored the penalty awarded to the respondent by the Superintendent of Police.

4. In support of this petition it is contended on behalf of the petitioners that after joining the police force of the new Province the respondent had in preference to the rules in force in Bahawalpur State voluntarily adopted the rules applicable in the old Province of Punjab. This was an option freely exercised by him. Under the Police Rules applicable to the old Province of the Punjab the Deputy Inspector General had the power to enhance the punishment awarded to a police officer by a lower authority. In the circumstances the Punjab Service Tribunal erred in holding that the order of the Deputy Inspector General enhancing the punishment earlier awarded to the respondent was without jurisdiction.

5. The contention raised on behalf of the petitioners needs examination. Leave to appeal is accordingly granted. The appeal should be made ready for hearing on the present record with permission to the parties to file additional documents, if any. M.I./S‑37/S Leave granted.