1987 PLP 1238 (MLD)
UMAR HAYAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1238 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Riaz Ahmad, J |
| Parties | UMAR HAYAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1238 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1238 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1238 (MLD) (UMAR HAYAT — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Masood Mirza for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 8th March, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307--Bail: grant of--Accused behind bars for about 7-1/2 months--Challan put up in Court without any progress--No evidence led by prosecution--Last opportunity provided to prosecution for production of its evidence--Bail allowed in circumstances. Umar Hayat for the State.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner is involved in a case registered against him under section 307, P.P.C. The occurrence in which the petitioner participated took place on 7th July, 1986 and the petitioner was arrested on 13th July, 1986. Since then the petitioner is behind the bars and the challan in this case was submitted on 23rd September, 1986. It is stated that since the submission of challan till today no evidence has been led by the prosecution. It is further submitted that last opportunity has been provided A by the Judicial Magistrate to the prosecution to lead the evidence. All the assertions are not controverted by the counsel for the State. In this view of the matter without expressing any opinion us to the merits of the case, I direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes security in the sum of Rs.20,000 (Rs. Twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Jhang. S.A./U-8/L Bail granted.