2000 PLP 1237 (SCMR)
Government of Sindh — Petitioner Versus AHSANULLAH — Respondent
| Citation | 2000 PLP 1237 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sh. Ijaz Nisar, Marrioon Kazi and Kamal Mansur Alam, JJ |
| Parties | Government of Sindh — Petitioner Versus AHSANULLAH — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 1237 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 1237 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sh. Ijaz Nisar, Marrioon Kazi and Kamal Mansur Alam, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 1237 (SCMR) (Government of Sindh — Petitioner Versus AHSANULLAH — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ainuddin, Additional Advocate-General with Wajahat Niaz, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 26th July, 1999.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment/order, dated 27-11-1998, of the Sindh Service Tribunal at Karachi, in Appeal. No. 30 of 1998).
Art.212(3)
Keeping in civil servant without posting
Service Tribunal allowed appeal of civil servant with finding that in case an officer was not given any posting the loss caused to Government would be recovered from personal pocket of the posting and transferring Authority
Service Tribunal was not justified to give such observation in the judgment
Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and such portion of judgment of Service Tribunal was ordered to be deleted by Supreme Court.
Judgment & Decree
SH. IJAZ NISAR, J.
Leave is sought against the judgment, dated 27-11-1998, passed by the Sindh Service Tribunal, Karachi, containing an observation that if any civil servant is kept without posting, the loss occasioned to the Government, shall be recovered from the personal pocket of the posting and transferring authority concerned.
2. The relevant facts are that by means of notification dated 12-9-1997, issued by the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Ahsanullah respondent (BPS-19) was directed to report to the Education Department for further orders. The respondent challenged the said notification in the Sindh Service Tribunal, contending that he had neither been given posting nor paid any salary. The Service Tribunal by judgment dated 27-11-1998 allowed the appeal directing the petitioner to ensure payment of salary to the respondent as per legal entitlement with a further direction to place his case before the appropriate Selection Board for his posting as Chief Engineer/Project Director Education Works Department, subject to the prescribed criteria. The Tribunal also made the following observation:-- "We would also like to observe and direct here that no civil servant should be kept without posting in violation of the existing laws of the subject and if it so happened the loss to the official treasury should be recovered from the personal pocket of transfer and posting authority concerned whosoever he may be."
3. The Government of Sindh has challenged the above observation only. Although the petition is barred by time, but in view of the fact that its condonation will not affect the rights of Ahsanullah respondent, who, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, has been accommodated in pursuance of the impugned judgment and paid salary for the period under challenge. We, therefore, condone the delay.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no justification for the above observation, as normally no civil servant is kept without posting however, sometimes consideration of suitability of the officer concerned for the available posts takes time which is never taken as a punishment. According to him the observation that in case the officer is not given any posting, the loss caused to the Government shall be recovered from the personal pocket of posting and transferring authority is harsh and is not in keeping with the administrative policy to decide and determine the suitability of an officer to hold a particular office. It may not always be possible to give immediate posting to a transferred officer as several factors have to be considered before any such order is passed.
5. In the circumstances narrated above, we think that there was no justification for an observation in the impugned judgment that if a civil servant is kept without posting, the loss caused to the treasury shall be recovered from the personal pocket of transferring and posting authority concerned. We, therefore, convert the petition into appeal, allow it and delete the abovenoted portion from the judgment. However, we would like to observe that if a civil servant is transferred without further posting, immediate steps should be taken to give him further posting to avoid loss to the public exchequer. Q.M.H./M.A.K./P-8/S Order accordingly.