1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Ch. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MAJITHIA Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman |
| Parties | Ch. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MAJITHIA Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and another |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Ch. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MAJITHIA Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Sayeed Akhtar for Appellant.
- A.G. Humayun, D.A. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 24th November, .1990.
Headnotes / Summary
Adverse remarks, expunction of
Appellant, Additional District and Sessions Judge was communicated adverse remarks recorded by an Inspection Judge against him
Remarks as conveyed appearing to be an honest assessment of work and conduct of appellant which otherwise came under review before High Court from time to time and could also be based on credible information received from Members of the Bar
Conduct of appellant during period under report, also came under judicial scrutiny in a petition for cancellation of bail before arrest in a case under S. 302, Penal Code, granted by appellant and while cancelling the bail it was noticed by High Court that conduct of the appellant was objectionable as he failed to observe normal practice of Court in not making necessary inquiry and requisite certificate as to the disposal of a previous application by the Sessions Judge and, pending petition for cancellation of bail in High Court granted bail after arrest to other accused in the cross-case by taking sting out of the case and to satisfy complainant party
Conduct of appellant was condemned as most reprehensible
Appeal against adverse remarks being devoid of any merits was dismissed. Government of the Punjab v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC 684 rel.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 798/392 of 1987, decided on 15th December, 1990.
Adverse remarks, expunction of
Appellant, Additional District and Sessions Judge was communicated adverse remarks recorded by an Inspection Judge against him
Remarks as conveyed appearing to be an honest assessment of work and conduct of appellant which otherwise came under review before High Court from time to time and could also be based on credible information received from Members of the Bar
Conduct of appellant during period under report, also came under judicial scrutiny in a petition for cancellation of bail before arrest in a case under S. 302, Penal Code, granted by appellant and while cancelling the bail it was noticed by High Court that conduct of the appellant was objectionable as he failed to observe normal practice of Court in not making necessary inquiry and requisite certificate as to the disposal of a previous application by the Sessions Judge and, pending petition for cancellation of bail in High Court granted bail after arrest to other accused in the cross-case by taking sting out of the case and to satisfy complainant party
Conduct of appellant was condemned as most reprehensible
Appeal against adverse remarks being devoid of any merits was dismissed. Government of the Punjab v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC 684 rel. Muhammad Sayeed Akhtar for Appellant. A.G. Humayun, D.A. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 24th November, .1990.