1990 PLP 1468 (SCMR)
HAMEED AHMAD TARAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1468 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | HAMEED AHMAD TARAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XXXI of 1958)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1468 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XXXI of 1958)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1468 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1468 (SCMR) (HAMEED AHMAD TARAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jafry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 26th July, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment dated 19‑10‑1986 of the Federal Service Tribunal in Appeal No. 32(L) of 1983). ‑‑‑S. 17(1‑A)‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)‑‑Removal from service‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑Tribunal after examining record of petitioner who was removed from service and after taking into consideration material placed before it by Authority, found that there was sufficient basis with Authority to take action against petitioner‑‑No substantial question of law being involved in case, finding of fact recorded by Tribunal, could not be interfered with‑‑Leave to appeal was refused.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 17(1‑A)‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)‑‑Removal from service‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑Tribunal after examining record of petitioner who was removed from service and after taking into consideration material placed before it by Authority, found that there was sufficient basis with Authority to take action against petitioner‑‑No substantial question of law being involved in case, finding of fact recorded by Tribunal, could not be interfered with‑‑Leave to appeal was refused. Muhammad Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jafry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 26th July, 1989. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑‑The petitioner was an employee of the Water and Power Development Authority and was serving as Line Superintendent in the Hafizabad Sub‑Division. By an order dated 12‑1‑1983 the Authority removed him from service in exercise of its power under section 17(1‑A) of the WAPDA Act. He filed an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal which was dismissed. He now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. After examining the petitioner's record and the material placed before it by the Authority, the learned Tribunal found that there was sufficient basis with the Authority to take action against the petitioner under section 17(1‑A), ibid. It is a finding of fact and the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to challenge it before us. As the contention raised by the learned counsel does not involve any substantial question of law, leave is refused. H.B.T./H‑86/S Leave refused.