1994 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AMIN alias BODA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AMIN alias BODA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AMIN alias BODA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- NA. Butt for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34
Accused had allegedly spied on the two deceased persons and informed the co-accused of their presence in the area in pursuance of which co-accused had shot the deceased persons dead
Accused who had remained in custody for over a year had made out a case for his release on bail
Judgment & Decree
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34
Accused had allegedly spied on the two deceased persons and informed the co-accused of their presence in the area in pursuance of which co-accused had shot the deceased persons dead
Accused who had remained in custody for over a year had made out a case for his release on bail
Accused was admitted to bail accordingly. NA. Butt for Petitioner. Shahbaz Saeed Sajid for the State. Date of hearing: 7th December, 1993. The alleged contribution which Amin petitioner had made towards the murders of Rahat Munir alias Tipu and Ishtiaq was that he had allegedly spied on the two deceased persons and had informed Abdul Rehman of the presence of the said deceased persons in the area in pursuance of which, the said Abdul Rehman and one Jumma Khan finally went and shot the two deceased persons dead.
2. Muhammad Akram Cheema, Inspector/I.O. of the C.I.A., Staff, Lahore, who had also investigated this case had referred me to the statements of one Bashir and one Amjad Pervaiz in this connection. I consider it proper to exercise restraint in the matter of making comments on the said statements and the connection of Amin petitioner which is consequently being sought to be established with the murders in question. Suffice it, however, to say that the petitioner who has remained in custody for over a year, has made out a case for his release on bail. He is accordingly admitted to bail in case F.I.R. No.363/92 of Police Station, Lower Mall, Lahore, subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.30,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Lahore. N.H.Q./M-1539/L Bail granted.