2020 PLP 2105 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2020 PLP 2105 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Mushir Alam, Yahya Afridi and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2020 PLP 2105 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2020 PLP 2105 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mushir Alam, Yahya Afridi and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2020 PLP 2105 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Javed Imran Ranjha, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Khadim Hussain Qaiser, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the order dated 22.07.2020 passed by the Lahore High Court Lahore in Crl. Misc. No. 28210-B of 2020)
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302(b)
Qatl-i-amd
Accused was not initially named in the crime report
Deceased was found to have sustained three entry wounds, which were individually assigned to the nominated co-accused persons
Attribution belatedly assigned to the accused did not correspond both with the findings recorded by the Medical Officer as well as the number of unknown assailants mentioned in the crime report
Although the accused was identified by the witnesses in a test identification parade, but the circumstances of the case brought his case, squarely within the remit of S. 497(2), Cr.P.C.
Alleged culpability of accused being a paid participant/assassin in the crime could be best settled after recording of evidence
Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and allowed, and the accused was released on bail. Rana Abdul Majeed, Additional Prosecutor General Punjab with M. Riaz, SI P.S. Civil Lines, M.B. Din for the State. Khadim Hussain Qaiser, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.
Muhammad Arif, 52, was shot dead at 2:55 p.m. on 11.12.2019, in front of District Courts, within the precincts of Police Station Civil Lines Mandi Bahauddin, shortly after attending court proceedings while awaiting public transport along with Gul Muhammad, Bashir Ahmed, Tariq Mehmood and Faiz Ahmed, PWs; Tariq Mehmood, deceased's real brother lodged the report with the police and blamed Khawar Riaz, Atif Nawaz, Muhammad Zubair and Khizar Hayat accompanied by two unknown assailants, with multiple fire shots to the deceased on the instigation of Riaz Ahmad, Muhammad Ashraf son of Ghulam Rasool and Armaghan Asim. Past blood feud is cited as motive for the crime. Autopsy revealed three independent entry wounds while an exiting projectile re-entered the body again with a corresponding exit. Barring Muhammad Zubair, attributed a fire shot to Gul Muhammad PW, remainder of the accused were assigned shots to the deceased. Khizar Hayat co-accused, assigned a specific shot to the deceased, was exonerated during the course of investigation and granted pre-arrest, without challenge by the complainant. The petitioner emerged in the array as one of the unknown assailants; arrested on 25.01.2020 under section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, he alongside Zishan Wali and Muhammad Iftikhar was identified by the witnesses in a test identification parade held on 28.01.2020 as a hired assassin engaged by the co-accused to prosecute their object.
2. Heard. Record perused.
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner was not initially named in the crime report; he has been picked with two others by graduating the number of unknown assailants to three, who according to the complainant had also effectively targeted the deceased, medically found to have three entry wounds, individually assigned to the nominated accused. These circumstances, result of the test identification parade notwithstanding, nonetheless, squarely bring petitioner's case within the remit of subsection (2) of section 497 of the Code ibid as attribution belatedly assigned to him does not correspond both with the findings recorded by the Medical Officer as well as the number of unknown assailants mentioned in the crime report. In this backdrop, his alleged culpability of being a paid participant in the crime can be best settled after recording of evidence. Criminal Petition No.923 of 2020 is converted into appeal and allowed; petitioner/appellant shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.500,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/duty Judge. MWA/M-49/SC Bail granted.