1988 P Cr (PLP)
PIR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus IFTIKHAR AHMAD‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1988 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J |
| Parties | PIR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus IFTIKHAR AHMAD‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 P Cr (PLP) (PIR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus IFTIKHAR AHMAD‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Inayat Ullah Cheema for Petitioner.
- R.A. Awan for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 14th February, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 526‑‑Transfer of criminal case‑=Additional Sessions Judge, seized of murder case, in a bona fide way attempting for compromise between parties but this gesture not appreciated by one of parties‑‑Opposite party also having no objection to the transfer of case to some other Court‑‑Case entrusted to the Sessions Judge for trial and decision according to law.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 526‑‑Transfer of criminal case‑=Additional Sessions Judge, seized of murder case, in a bona fide way attempting for compromise between parties but this gesture not appreciated by one of parties‑‑Opposite party also having no objection to the transfer of case to some other Court‑‑Case entrusted to the Sessions Judge for trial and decision according to law. Inayat Ullah Cheema for Petitioner. R.A. Awan for Respondent. Date of hearing: 14th February, 1988. It is admitted by both the learned counsel that Mr. Fayyaz Hamid Qureshi, Additional Sessions Judge acted in a bona fide manner to effect a compromise between the parties who are involved in long drawn criminal murder litigation. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in spite of the good intention of learned Additional Sessions Judge, the petitioner wants this case to be transferred to some other Court to avoid any embarrassment to the learned Judge. The learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has no objection to the transfer of this case to some other Court, if deemed proper.
2. I have considered the circumstances of this case. It goes without saying that Mr. Fayyaz Hamid Qureshi, Additional Sessions Judge is a God fearing honest officer. He is a bona fide way thought to make an attempt for compromise between the parties which, it appears, has not been appreciated at least by the present petitioner.
3. As there is no objection to transfer of the case by respondent No.1, I direct that the complaint titled Iftikhar Ahmad v. Pir Muhammad and 2 others under section 302/307/34, P.P.C. alongwith its connected challan case titled State v. Shaukat Ali, be entrusted to learned Sessions Judge, Lahore, for trial and decision according to law. The learned Sessions Judge will himself try both the cases as expeditiously as possible. This petition stands disposed of. S.G.D./F‑37/L Case transferred.