PLC(CS) 2011

2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

SULTAN AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation, Punjab and another

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.8545 of 2010, decided on 22nd November, 2010.
Honorable Judges
Sh. Ahmad Farooq, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Sh. Ahmad Farooq, J
Parties SULTAN AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation, Punjab and another
Primary Law Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Sh. Ahmad Farooq, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (SULTAN AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Irrigation, Punjab and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963

Representation

  • Mazhar Hayat for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

R. 3.5

Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199

Constitutional petition

Retirement on own request of civil servant

Petitioner who had been retired from his service on his own written option for retirement after completion of 25 years qualifying service for pension purpose, had prayed for passing a direction to the authorities to permit him to continue his service

Petitioner after the retirement was receiving pension from date of his retirement

According to R.3.5 of the Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963, once an option to retire after 25 years qualifying service was submitted the same would be final, provided that it was withdrawn before its acceptance by the competent authority

Petitioner not only opted to retire on completion of 25 years service, but had also started receiving his pension

Neither any illegality was found in the retirement letter nor any discriminatory treatment had been meted out to the petitioner

Constitutional petition being devoid of any legal force, was dismissed, in circumstances. Jawad Hassan, Addl. A.-G.

Judgment & Decree

SH. AHMAD FAROOQ, J.

Through the instant petition, under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the petitioner has prayed for passing a direction to respondent No.1 to permit him to continue his service as "Tubewell Operator".

2. It is, inter alia, contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was working as Tubewell Operator at Jaliana Section, Sline Zone No.III, Sub-Division, Shahpur District Sargodha and the office-bearers of the union of the Irrigation Department fraudulently got his signatures as well as the signatures of many other Tubewell Operators on the Retirement Pension Forms. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that some of the colleagues of the petitioner, who had opted to retire after completion of 25 years qualifying service along with the petitioner, have been allowed to continue their service, but the said relief has not been granted to the petitioner, which amounts to discrimination and violative of Article 25 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.

3. Respondent No.2 submitted his report and parawise comments, wherein, it is mentioned that the present petitioner has given his option for retirement, after completion of 25 years qualifying service, whereupon, his retirement order was issued on 19-6-2009. Thereafter, not only the present petitioner submitted his pension papers but also receiving the pension since 1-8-2009. Respondent No.2 further submitted that the claim of the present petitioner cannot be entertained at this stage according to Rule 3.5 of the Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963.

4. Arguments heard. Record perused.

5. From the report of respondent No.2, it is established that the petitioner has been retired from Government Service at his own request for retirement, after, completion of 25 years qualifying service, which is evident from his application, attached with the reply as Annexure "B". Thereafter, vide letter dated 19-6-2009, the petitioner was retired from the Government service w.e.f. 31-7-2009 on his own written option for retirement, after completion of 25 years qualifying service for pension purpose. The petitioner is also receiving the pension since 1-8-2009. According to Rule 3.5 of the Punjab Civil Service Pension Rules, 1963, an option to retire after 25 years qualifying service, once submitted, shall be final provided that the same is withdrawn before its acceptance by the competent authority.

6. In this case not only the petitioner opted to retire on completion of 25 years service but has also started receiving his pension. Hence, neither there is any illegality in the retirement letter, dated 19.6-2009, nor any discriminatory treatment has been meted out to the present petitioner. Therefore, the instant petition is devoid of any legal force and the same is accordingly dismissed. H.B.T./S 253/L Petition dismissed.