1968S3191 (PLP)
N/A
| Citation | 1968S3191 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | N/A |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968S3191 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968S3191 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968S3191 (PLP) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Raja Muhammad Akram, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Iqbal Ahmad Qureshi. Attorney for Petitioner.
- Ifrtikhar-ul-Haq Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Respondent No. 1.
- Raja Said Akbar Khan, Advocate-General West Pakistan (Muhammad Ashraf) Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Ijaz Ali, Attorney for Respondent No. 2.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI J.
The subject-matter is the order of Mr. Fair Khan. Magistrate, Section 30, Lahore, by which he directed that during the trial of the complaint instituted by the petitioner against the respondent under sections 406, 420, 468 and
471. P. P. C. the motor car in-dispute shall remain on superdari with one Abdul Hamid on execution of a proper bond. Perhaps the more appropriate order should have been to entrust the car to in automobile dealer as was directed by this, Court in a similar case so that the car is properly maintained and not put to use during the pendency of the complaint, but we do not consider that the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 5b is attracted to grant special leave to appeal from the interlocutory order of the trial Magistrate merely on the ground of propriety Fire petitioner may, however, approach the trial Magistrate if so advised for a fresh order of superdari in the nature indicated above. The petition is dismissed. Lave refused.