YLRN 2019

2019 PLP 68 (YLRN)

AMAR AMAN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No. 1502 of 2018, decided on 23rd April, 2019.
Honorable Judges
Nazar Akbar, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2019 PLP 68 (YLRN)
Forum / Court Sindh
Bench Members Nazar Akbar, J
Parties AMAR AMAN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2019 PLP 68 (YLRN)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2019 PLP 68 (YLRN)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Nazar Akbar, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2019 PLP 68 (YLRN) (AMAR AMAN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ms. Abida Parveen Channar, Special Prosecutor, ANF for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Ss. 9(c), 14 & 15

Bail, grant of

Case of further inquiry

Delay in conclusion of trial

Knowledge of accused

Proof

Accused was arrested for having 'Bilty' (Bill of Lading) seeking release of consignment of leather goods which allegedly contained 3.200 kilograms of heroin

Validity

Accused had only come with 'Bilty' (Bill of Lading) and consignment was not handed over to him

Accused was arrested only because he had 'Bilty' (Bill of Lading), in which consignment was mentioned as leather jackets

Prima facie it was a case of further inquiry as to whether accused himself was involved in change of consignment from leather jackets into contraband items recovered in said consignment by prosecution before even disclosing to accused

Accused was already behind the bars since 2014 and was not required for investigation

Bail was allowed in circumstances. Waqar Alam Abbasi for Applicant.

Judgment & Decree

NAZAR AKBAR, J.

Through instant bail application, applicant/ accused seeks bail after arrest in FIR No.07/2018, under Sections 9(c), 14, 15 of CNS Act, 1997 registered at Police Station ANF, Clifton, Karachi. Earlier the applicant/accused approached the Special Court-II (C.N.S) Karachi for post arrest bail, which was declined vide order dated 11.10.2018. Thereafter, the applicant approached this Court for grant of post arrest bail.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case as per FIR are that on 16.03.2018 Complainant Zahid Ali Joya of PS ANF Clifton, Karachi recovered a carton from Pak International Goods Transport Company, Karachi at about 1530 hours along with other ANF staff which was booked by a person namely Asghar Aman containing 20 leather jackets and on checking from three leather jackets three polythene bags containing heroin powder weighing 3.200 Kgs recovered and subsequently when the accused Amar Aman went to Pak International Goods Transport Company, Karachi on 19.3.2018 along with original Bilty SI Zahid Ali Joya along with staff of ANF arrested him. Earlier FIR was lodged when recovery had effected.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that recovery has not been effected from the direct possession or pointation of the accused and vehemently contended that it was in the natural course of business that a person who booked a parcel of jackets, how could he be guilty if anything other than the jacket is found in the parcel which was sent by another person from Rawalpindi. He vehemently denied that he is brother of the accused involved in the narcotics found in the jacket. The accused has been falsely involved in this case and the matter requires further inquiry into the guilt of the accused.

4. Learned Addl. P.G opposed this bail application on the ground that 3.200 Kgs heroin powder recovered from a carton which was booked by the Amar Aman by using the fake name of Asghar and the accused was arrested red handed while he had gone to receive the carton along with original Bilty because the consignee had not gone to receipt it and on the intention of his brother, accused went to take it, she prayed for dismissal of bail application.

5. I have heard the arguments and perused the record.

6. The only role of the accused / applicant is that he had a Bilty of the consignment coming from Rawalpindi to be delivered to him at Karachi. The booking clerk of Pak International Goods Transport Company informed the ANF before the applicant reaches to receive it and even FIR was lodged. As soon as he has come to collect the consignment, which according to the Prosecution was containing contraband 3.200 Kgs, he was arrested before handing over of the consignment to him.

7. According to learned Spl. Prosecutor of ANF the factual position is that he has only come with Bilty and the consignment was not handed over to him. A man has been arrested only because he is having a Bilty, in which the consignment was mentioned as leather jackets. Therefore, prima facie, it is a case of further inquiry that whether the accused / applicant himself was involved in the change of consignment from leather jackets into contraband items recovered in the said consignment by Prosecution before even disclosing to the applicant. The applicant / accused is already behind the bar since 14 months, and he is not required for investigation.

8. In view of the above, the applicant / accused is admitted to bail subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

9. Needless to mention here that the observations made hereinabove are tentative in nature and would not influence the trial Court while deciding the case of the applicant/accused on merits. M.H./A-95/Sindh Bail granted.