PLC(CS) 1995

1995 PLP 682 (PLC(CS))

PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING EMPLOYEES' UNION, HYDERABAD through its General Secretary Versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD REGION, HYDERABAD and another

Jurisdiction / Court
Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
Decided Date
Appeal No. SUK‑359 of 1994, decided on 27th April, 1995.
Honorable Judges
Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1995 PLP 682 (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
Bench Members Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal
Parties PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING EMPLOYEES' UNION, HYDERABAD through its General Secretary Versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD REGION, HYDERABAD and another
Primary Law Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 682 (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 682 (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 682 (PLC(CS)) (PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING EMPLOYEES' UNION, HYDERABAD through its General Secretary Versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD REGION, HYDERABAD and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Rana Mehmood Ali, Representative for Appellant.
  • Nadir Khan Yousufzai for Respondent No. 1.
  • NA. Talpur for Respondent No. 2.
  • Date of hearing: 25th April, 1995.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑Ss.1(2), 8 & 34‑‑‑Factories Act (XXV of 1934), S. 2(g)(b)‑‑‑Registration of trade union‑‑‑Registrar of Trade Unions by consent order was ordered to conduct enquiry and delete names of those employee members of union who were found to come under definition of civil servant under Civil Servants Act, 1973‑‑‑Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 not being applicable to civil servants, names of members of union found to come under definition of civil servant, were rightly deleted by Registrar of Trade Unions as they could not form union under Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969.

Judgment & Decree

This appeal by Public Health Engineering Employees Union is directed against the order of Sindh Labour Court No.VII, Sukkur (Camp at Hyderabad) dated 6‑6‑1994 whereby the grievance application under section 34 of I.R.O., 1969, against the Registrar and the Public Health Department for deleting the names of 547 members, including the Appellant Union as Workers by the Registrar were held to be in accordance with law and the application of the Union was dismissed.

2. The facts, in brief, are as under:‑ .

3. The employees of Public Health Engineering Department Hyderabad formed their union and got it registered by the Registrar of Trade Unions Hyderabad Region, Hyderabad. The Public Health Department applied to the Labour Court against the registration of its employees; who were civil servants. The Labour Court passed an order suspending the working of the Union. The Union filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against these above orders of the Labour Court. By consent order the Registrar was directed to conduct an enquiry and delete the names of those employees members of the Union who were found to come under the definition of civil servant of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. The Registrar called for the appointment orders of the Members of the Union, heard the parties and then deleted the names of 547 employees as members of the said Union. This order of the Registrar was challenged by the Union before the Sindh Labour Court. The said Court found that the act of the Registrar was strictly according to law. He accordingly dismissed the application of the Union. Against this dismissal the Union has filed this appeal.

4. It is admitted by all the, parties that Civil Servant falling within the definition given in the Civil Servants Act, 1973 cannot form a Union. Clause (b) of subsection (2) of section (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 provides `that the Ordinance shall not apply to civil servants'. Under section 2(b) of Civil Servants Act, 1973 `civil servant' is to mean a person who is Member of an All Pakistan Service or of a Civil Service of a Federation, or who holds a civil post in connection with the affairs of a Federation, but does not include a person who is a worker or workman as defined in the Factories Act, 1934. Under section 2(h) of the Factories Act, 1934: "`Worker' means a person employed in any manufacturing process or in cleaning any part of the machinery or premises used for a manufacturing process or in any other kind of work whatsoever, incidental to or connected with the subject of the manufacturing process but does not include any person solely employed in a clerical capacity in any room or place where no manufacturing process is being carried on." "Manufacturing Process." is defined under section 2(g) of the Factories Act as: "any process for making, altering, repairing, packing of any article for transport, delivery or disposal or for pumping oil, water or sewerage or generating or transmitting power:' Thus, the person employed in the work of pumping water or sewerage will not come within the scope within the scope of civil servant under the Civil Servants Act, 1973.

5. The Registrar of Trade Unions, on getting directions by consent order of the Tribunal held his proceedings and deleted the names of 547 workers under the Public Health Engineering Department, Hyderabad by scrutinizing the work of each person by name and after hearing him.

6. It is argued by Rana Mehmood Ali, Representative of the Union, that the Registrar should have deleted the names by designation excluding a particular class of workers but he has excluded even the General Secretary of the Union. However, if the General Secretary falls under the definition of `civil servant' he has to be excluded by name. .

7. I find no substance in this appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed and the order of Sindh Labour Court No.VII, Sukkur (Camp at Hyderabad) is maintained. H.B.T./2449/Lb.S Appeal dismissed.