1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
GHULAM HUSSAIN BALOCH Versus GOVT OF SINDH, through the Chief Secretary and 2 others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | GHULAM HUSSAIN BALOCH Versus GOVT OF SINDH, through the Chief Secretary and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, Chairman, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (GHULAM HUSSAIN BALOCH Versus GOVT OF SINDH, through the Chief Secretary and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Manzoor Ali Khan for Appellant.
- M. Aqil Awan for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th April, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
S.4
Civil servant, a Taxation Officer, having detected two cases had recovered heroin from accused
Civil servant, thereafter knowingly causing disappearance of case property, in order to secure acquittal of accused and after enquiry was imposed punishment of reduction to the minimum of B.P.S.11 for a period of one year
Civil servant, despite knowledge that appeal of accused was still pending in Federal Shariat Court, had got case property destroyed pre-maturely
Civil servant's explanation that due to shortage of space in the Malkhana case property had to be destroyed in public interest, was far from convincing
Civil servant in such eventuality, was supposed to have obtained Court's order for safe custody of property or in the alternative for its destruction but could not arrogate to himself power of Court and decide at his own level about destruction of property
Civil servant, being responsible for premature destruction of case property, punishment awarded to him was already lenient and did not call for interference.
Judgment & Decree
GOVT OF SINDH, through the Chief Secretary and 2 others Appeal No. 77 of 1990, decided on 9th April, 1991.
S.4
Civil servant, a Taxation Officer, having detected two cases had recovered heroin from accused
Civil servant, thereafter knowingly causing disappearance of case property, in order to secure acquittal of accused and after enquiry was imposed punishment of reduction to the minimum of B.P.S.11 for a period of one year
Civil servant, despite knowledge that appeal of accused was still pending in Federal Shariat Court, had got case property destroyed pre-maturely
Civil servant's explanation that due to shortage of space in the Malkhana case property had to be destroyed in public interest, was far from convincing
Civil servant in such eventuality, was supposed to have obtained Court's order for safe custody of property or in the alternative for its destruction but could not arrogate to himself power of Court and decide at his own level about destruction of property
Civil servant, being responsible for premature destruction of case property, punishment awarded to him was already lenient and did not call for interference. Manzoor Ali Khan for Appellant. M. Aqil Awan for Respondents. Date of hearing: 9th April, 1991.