PCRLJ 1996

1995 P Cr (PLP)

JANAS KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Peshawar
Decided Date
1995-October-17
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1995 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Peshawar
Bench Members N/A
Parties JANAS KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 P Cr (PLP) (JANAS KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Sardar Aslam Afridi for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

West Pakistan Foodstuffs Control Act (XX of 1958), Ss.3 & 6-- Bail, grant of

Maximum sentence prescribed under S.6 of West Pakistan Foodstuffs Control Act, 1958 for contravention of S.3 of the said Act was three years or fine or both

Accused having already been sufficiently reprimanded by remaining in jail for more than one month, it would meet ends of justice if he was released on bail, especially when case against accused did not fall within prohibition contained in S.497, Cr.P.C.

Judgment & Decree

Sardar Aslam Afridi for Petitioner. Fateh Muhammad Khan for the State. Date of hearing: 17th October, 1995. Janas Khan, petitioner herein, has come to -this Court with the prayer that he be released on bail in case F.I.R. No.251, dated 15-9-1995 registered at Police Station, Kotwali, Peshawar under sections 3 and 6, West Pakistan Foodstuffs (Control) Act, 1958. Petitioner was refused bail by the learned M.I.C. through his order, dated 19-9-1995. He then preferred his application in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Peshawar for the grant of bail but met with no better fate and the same was dismissed through order, dated 26-9-1995.

2. The case of the prosecution as against the present petitioner is that he is a butcher by profession and runs the shop of meat selling. It is stated that Mr. Masoodur Rehman Sethi, Special Magistrate was on routine checking of essential commodities and during this checking he found that the petitioner had not affixed the price list in his shop. It is also alleged that the petitioner was caught red-handed by the said Magistrate while selling meat on higher rate than the one prescribed by the Government. He was, therefore, arrested and the present case registered against him.

3. So far as the charges against the present petitioner are concerned, this Court would refrain to dilate upon the merits of the case because it may prejudice the proceedings at the trial. Nevertheless there is something more to be said about the quantum of sentence prescribed for the offences the petitioner has been charged with.

4. A perusal of sections 3 and 6 of the Foodstuffs (Control) Act, 1958 indicates that section 3 empowers the Government to pass any reasonable order for controlling the sale, purchase and supply of the essential commodities and the contravention of any such order has been made punishable under section 6 of the Act. A perusal of section 6 would indicate that the maximum sentence prescribed for contravention of section 3 has been determined as 3 years or fine or both. While taking into consideration this aspect of the case this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner has already been sufficiently reprimanded by remaining in jail for more than one month. Therefore, it would better meet the ends of justice if he is released on bail because the case against him does not fall within the purview of prohibition contained in section 497, Cr.P.C.

5. Resultantly, this petition is allowed and Janas Khan son of Waris Khan, petitioner herein, shall be released on bail if he furnishes bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rupees one hundred thousands) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate. H.B.T./1882/P Bail granted.